Remember when "Choosing champions unsuited for their role" was bannable?
I do, WookieCookie.
Amazing.
"Riot doesn't enforce the meta"
I do, WookieCookie.
Amazing.
"Riot doesn't enforce the meta"
riot mods have always been shit
"Fid bot lane as support but without support items"
Oh no, the horror! It's almost like... that's exactly what any mage support does these days.
Remember when Ranked was ment to be tooken seriously?
I do.
Wouldnt that mean Ezreal was bannable since release?
At the time, Fiora mid was possible in some very niche matchups. Her kit wasn't good against casters but it was still viable against some more common mid laners (like Yasuo after he was released).
Side note: I kinda miss the tribunal. I mean, it wasnt a perfect system, but I felt it could've been improved had they pre selected the right players, the ones that actually took there time to read the chats before voting and not just waiting for the timer to tick out. Back when it was the players that decided, it kinda gave ya a sense of ownership, responsibility over what kind of things we tolerate and did not.
IDK, Maybe I'm just the old timer, reminiscing on the old days.
Just for clarification, this formally is no longer the rule. Realistically....
Your account will still be locked temporarily. I guess until you can prove your innocence, in a convincing manner.
Were you experimenting or had you experimented significantly in normal matches beforehand?
well thank goodness that doesn't exist anymore. I almost always play odd champs in odd roles.