Lulu has one of the most toxic kits in the game.

greekvandaL·Mar 22, 2018·2 votes·505 views

We havent nerfed her out of viability once. She shouldnt be allowed to be playable with such a low skill uninteractive kit.

Everytime i come back to your shitty game i'm forced to ban Lulu otherwhise even a guy without fingers will solo win the game by pressing R on someone making him a god that cannot be killed or even if you are ahead she hovers her mouse over you and you are dead pretty much 100% unless they are extremenly far behind.

It got stupid that i cannot ban anything else besides Lulu unless i wanna get perm'd again by telling him to hung himself.

6 Comments

Pixie StormMar 22, 20182 votes

Same could be said for Yi, Tryndamere, and Annie. Simple champions so that you can focus on the macro play of the game. Objectives, vision, ect.

greekvandaLMar 22, 20181 votes

[{quoted}](name=Pixie Storm ,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xrTvxtX2,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-03-22T14:53:08.768+0000)

Same could be said for Yi, Tryndamere, and Annie. Simple champions so that you can focus on the macro play of the game. Objectives, vision, ect.

There is no micro or macro. She is a plain doshit champ that doesnt allow other champions to be usable. And the only way to deal with her is to pick somethng that severly outranges her.

Pixie StormMar 22, 20182 votes

[{quoted}](name=silver 5 btw,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xrTvxtX2,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-03-22T15:06:45.228+0000)

There is no micro or macro. She is a plain doshit champ that doesnt allow other champions to be usable. And the only way to deal with her is to pick somethng that severly outranges her.

Wait so your argument is because a person is playing Lulu they don't have to predict incoming damage, ward, sweep, set up, just like any other support, buy locket, and grab a redemption.
[sg-lux-2] Better ban her in one for all because shes bullshit there btw.

greekvandaLMar 22, 20181 votes

[{quoted}](name=Pixie Storm ,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xrTvxtX2,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-03-22T15:11:04.682+0000)

Wait so your argument is because a person is playing Lulu they don't have to predict incoming damage, ward, sweep, set up, just like any other support, buy locket, and grab a redemption.
[sg-lux-2] Better ban her in one for all because shes bullshit there btw.

She has too many failsafe mechanics. Aka her fast travel Q is hard to dodge from point blank. Her Ulti gives a knockback that cant really be outplayed as a melee. Her W is just way too toxic for everything in the game almost as Toxic as Tahms W. She simply doesnt have downtimes after like 30% cdr which is far too easy to get. She plainly disguting and i want her Olaf'd

AbiwonKenabiMar 22, 20182 votes

If Lulu is close enough to point blank Q you or even E you, she should die, or at least be punished for being so close. She is pretty squishy, and slow when she doesn't have W on her.

Her ultimate can only be used on one person in a team fight, so if she picks a tank to ult or you force her to use it on herself then her team's carries are wide open.

I'll give you Polymorph can be annoying and hard to play against, but again, she has to be pretty close, and half the time its more beneficial for her to W her own carry for the movespeed/attack speed (plus now the extra Ardent proc from Aery) because they're in range and it will help them reposition/do damage.

You should never wish for a Champion to get Olaf'd. I think it feels awful for players and is a bad design policy. Perhaps Lulu needs a little more counter-play, but I think she has enough that she doesn't need to be nerfed into unplayability. Its not fair to people who enjoy playing her. I absolutely HATE some Champions, but I would never ask them to be Olaf'd.