I mean, it is PRETTY obvious that we need it since riot releases 1 patch per month and most of the times they don't fix goddamn BS champions. This would also give spot to champions that are not that played because other champions with mobility can do more damage in a safe way.
Dr Clueless PhD3 votesHow hard? Not very.
Since it's not done, it's pretty obvious to me that Riot doesn't think one is necessary. Also, they've said before that they don't want to add more (yet).
DropFill1 votes[{quoted}](name=Dr Clueless PhD,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xaEthZmQ,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2014-12-28T19:15:50.981+0000)
How hard? Not very.
Since it's not done, it's pretty obvious to me that Riot doesn't think one is necessary. Also, they've said before that they don't want to add more (yet).
It makes no sense. We have too much champions, too much laziness from riot, and too much OP kits that no one wants to play against, but are forced to sometimes.
Actin1 votesMuh LCS #BigPlays
DrNova1 votesI dont see the point. Why not add 5 per team, since there are easily 10 champs worth getting rid of every game?
WHY STOP AT 5!!!!
Suck it up buttercup.
DropFill1 votesI dont see the point. Why not add 5 per team, since there are easily 10 champs worth getting rid of every game?
WHY STOP AT 5!!!!
Suck it up buttercup.
Because 5 would be a REALLY drastic change that would force riot to work to balance champions, or they would NEVER be played until it. But I really prefer someone like Zed or Azir to be on a permaban status.
Deathshroud091 votesYour reasoning for wanting more bans is that of a peasant. This aside, 5 bans per team is actually really good when it comes to forming different strats. However, you need to have a staggered pick/ban phase in order for that to work.