You should consider not playing ranked

Hey,

I meant to tell you this yesterday when we played together, but I didn't get the chance. Do you remember when that enemy Morgana killed out fizz twice in the first 10 and you said "gg"? So here's the thing. We want you to play ranked, we do. But I'm concerned that you don't have the mental presence to compete.

I mean, we all have things we want to work on. I know I do. No one's perfect. But, also, remember how I had asked about your build order. I mean, did you get that from a guide? Oh, I see. Have you ever read a guide for another champ? ok well maybe consider that. And maybe after consider ranked. I mean, certainly, its your game too, but like, its also the other 4 players game. And we all read a guide. Remember how everyone else had a mastery badge? No, no, no one is saying its required, but I think everyone else just thinks, it's ranked, you know, and we can't all be expected to be fed. So we take champs we've used before to minimize the risk.

And that...well. no. right. I mean fun is important. But math has its place. I mean, isn't winning fun? No, come on. Be fair. We're all conceding facts here - you have more fun when you win. Ok. Thank you. I appreciate you're admitting that. I know it was hard. So if you think winning is fun, don't you think you should play champs that help you win?

You certainly should play new champs. Just not in ranked. Well because that's not what ranked is for. Well that's your opinion - no one says Normals are a waste of time. The forums? Who reads the forums? The point is, absolute failure in normals is at least respected because beyond the game there's no problems.

Look, all I'm saying is, if you're at all not confident in your role, or champion, or know how to counter pick, just play some normals. Because what's a bigger waste of time than a game that's lost by the 7 min. mark, and that goes for 45 mins.