Boards›Gameplay

With each new champion, the static amount of bans seems less and less useful.

JavelinJoe··7 votes·270 views

6 bans, 3 per side, for 130+ possible champions is hardly making a dent in anyone's pool let alone the fact that most of the time the bans are used on broken champions out of necessity. In all fairness, 10 bans total (5 per side) seems fair enough since then everyone would get 1 ban.

2 Comments

Hullabaloo9071 votes

With the way dynamic q is now, it does seem like it would make sense to give everyone a ban.

I think a lot of why they havnt yet is the way it would effect pro play. With 5 bans you could effectively minimize the choice of a single player to one or two champs

JavelinJoe1 votes

while true in that aspect, they could have a LCS only version with the same amount (6) if that is the issue.

More from Gameplay

3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay764 comments
7,167
votes
3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay156 comments
3,510
votes
UPVOTE FOR URF
Gameplay606 comments
2,440
votes
Yes plz.
Gameplay456 comments
1,721
votes
3 Refunds per season, up vote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay114 comments
1,716
votes
When is ANYONE at riot going to address the awful new player experience?
Gameplay634 comments
1,383
votes

More by JavelinJoe

Auto-filled players should lose less LP in losses and gain more in wins
Gameplay113 comments
261
votes
Please put pink wards at the top of the champion's recommended build menu in the shop.
Gameplay39 comments
245
votes
Give Caitlyn's traps the Azir soldier's mechanic for being under a tower.
Gameplay73 comments
176
votes
Can Caitlyn's traps get an outline when behind the environment?
Gameplay19 comments
151
votes
The "got chest already" champion border should appear in champion select
Gameplay25 comments
145
votes
Can we move the surrender timer to 15 minutes?
Gameplay50 comments
139
votes