I don't understand why Riot think its okay to implement brain dead to use champions and reward them highly for killing versus a champion that would actually take skill to use and proves to be mediocre despite being fed in comparison to a champion that just has to AA with a sated devourer and rageblade and presto, game won.
Fucking hate this meta.
Mhihnj3 votesEverything is on-hit nowadays.
3 hit passives crits guinsoos sated
Ackelope1 votescrit should've left when dodge did imo... i'm still clinging to a shred of hope that it'll make its way out eventually.
Kaleidos1 votesYou're complaining about items, yet blaming the Champions who build them? Why? Also, despite the AS jungle items that focused on stacks having always been problematic, that's hardly a major factor for the current meta. Tank stat prioritization, over-saturated AD itemization, and poor AP itemization are what define this meta, the jungle is the only place that's actually in a healthy spot right now.
Restless Slumber1 votesYet currently the most banned champions currently are junglers and not other champs. Sure there are a couple champs like Zed that goes mid and is often banned, but the vast majority of bans are towards abusers of sated.
Surfer Ashe1 votesTIL Sated is low risk XD
All it really needs is a slight cost increase. Cost increase = built later = less time to farm = less chance to be sated early and dominate.
MunchCrunchLunch1 votesto me thats basically champions that are tanky and do a lot of damage. the on hit devoure builds are an example. also someone like fiora is. and stupid quinn.
Moll1 votesI want to know what is low risk to you and champions you play
Athenes Lulu1 votesI know, Lulu is pretty darn toxic.
######Though it's mostly mid/toplane where she gets the "unpunishable" safety, no wonder why she's 100% pick/ban in competitive.
