Boards›Gameplay

Why not force both of Riven and Yasuo into 42% winrate like Urgot ?

ValiantKiller··12 votes·2,225 views

Special they are harder to learn and they supposed to have lower win rate, not the top of the charts.

Ohh wait...right they are Riven and Yasuo the gods of toxic players, the gods of selling skins and getting free money.

Urgot Was never able to abuse item 3053 neither Conquer neither able to hyper carry late game, he was just good lane bully better than Renekton and Tryndamere cause he got decent mid game but ofcoruse we got to gut him cause he doesn'tt play skins and able to shut down the cancer champions like Riven .

While on the other hand, Yasuo and Riven are cancer in lane to face them, have no mana and great abuser of every item and runes the game can offer not to mention they suppose to be late game champions yet they able to bully and win lanes easily against most of champions.

So why they not gutted to 42% winrate for having all the trades of hyper carry, tankines, abusing items and runes plus having no mana ? Let me guess cause they not "Ranged" like Urgot ?

12 Comments

Galiö14 votes

Cause neither of them where the undisputed God of competitive play for 7 months.

ValiantKiller3 votes

{quoted}

Cause neither of them where the undisputed God of competitive play for 7 months.

So he will get buffed when he get skin just like sej ?

TrainerRobo2 votes

Whether he was the toplane god of competitive play or not, I dont think any champion deserves to be dumpstered for multiple patches. Akali doesnt deserve it, Urgot doesnt deserve it. I hated akali and permabanned her when I played mid, but it's not fair to the mains of the champion to make them nigh unplayable.

Urgot has been my main since his rework, has my highest mastery points, was the first champion I was ever able to click with, and is the most fun champion for me to play in the game. I know there are many other like this with both Urgot, and Akali, and they both did deserve nerfs, but It's completely unfair to the mains of those champions to remove them from the game while they work on fixing them.

Galiö3 votes

Well urgot needed to be nerfed. Gutted though? Nah.

He was slightly nerfed twice and then had a huge gutting patch.

The W nerfs were gigantic, and felt out of nowhere since he wasnt touched for those 7 months of dominanace while as everything else was.

As for Akali, I didn't find her hard to play against (prob as a vlad and galio player) so unfortunate for her.

TrainerRobo3 votes

Thats what I was saying, I apologize that I didn't make it clear enough.

420 grams3 votes

They're not 100% pick/ban in pro play

ValiantKiller2 votes

[{quoted}](name=420 grams,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=r5QgyIhE,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-02-25T22:18:48.958+0000)

They're not 100% pick/ban in pro play

So they ruin it for the solo players cause pro abuse it ? right that is riot logic anyway buff and nerf according to pro plays.

Accursêd3 votes

that is exactly riots philosophy

ryze galio azir urgot aatrox

im sure theres more but those are all examples of gutted champions resulting from pro play

ValiantKiller2 votes

{quoted}

that is exactly riots philosophy

ryze galio azir urgot aatrox

im sure theres more but those are all examples of gutted champions resulting from pro play

Sadly that why i hate pro play.

D3m37r12 votes

If they do that we might finally lose the few remaining 12 year olds to Fortnite and Apex. Riot can't really afford that right now.

ValiantKiller3 votes

{quoted}

If they do that we might finally lose the few remaining 12 year olds to Fortnite and Apex. Riot can't really afford that right now.

Yep

SCP 1061 votes

{quoted}

Special they are harder to learn and they supposed to have lower win rate, not the top of the charts.

Ohh wait...right they are Riven and Yasuo the gods of toxic players, the gods of selling skins and getting free money.

Urgot Was never able to abuse item 3053 neither Conquer neither able to hyper carry late game, he was just good lane bully better than Renekton and Tryndamere cause he got decent mid game but ofcoruse we got to gut him cause he doesn'tt play skins and able to shut down the cancer champions like Riven .

While on the other hand, Yasuo and Riven are cancer in lane to face them, have no mana and great abuser of every item and runes the game can offer not to mention they suppose to be late game champions yet they able to bully and win lanes easily against most of champions.

So why they not gutted to 42% winrate for having all the trades of hyper carry, tankines, abusing items and runes plus having no mana ? Let me guess cause they not "Ranged" like Urgot ?

Because more people play Riven and yasuo, and they're a much higher skillcap when in terms of what you can do after tons of practice.

More from Gameplay

3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay764 comments
7,167
votes
3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay156 comments
3,510
votes
UPVOTE FOR URF
Gameplay606 comments
2,440
votes
Yes plz.
Gameplay456 comments
1,721
votes
3 Refunds per season, up vote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay114 comments
1,716
votes
When is ANYONE at riot going to address the awful new player experience?
Gameplay634 comments
1,383
votes

More by ValiantKiller

Can we stop with lee sin buffs?! What the hell is going on with balance team
Gameplay81 comments
133
votes
A message from jg in this meta to every laner
Gameplay188 comments
88
votes
I'm really tired of QSS against Urgot
Gameplay219 comments
75
votes
You know i don't care about this Yoirck nerfs but it show something funny about Riot logic
Gameplay76 comments
71
votes
Honestly as top laner i'm sick of playing against Vayne, so sick of this BS
Gameplay87 comments
67
votes
Why not...instead of buffing every ADC in the game and make them toxic, nerf lucain?
Gameplay140 comments
64
votes