@Meddler, how does it make sense to give Wit's end a ranged/melee clause but not Rageblade?
The melee/ranged difference was removed when Rageblade was reworked, but now you say you're giving melee champs more incentive to buy wit's end because it's harder for melees to get autoattacks in?
Where's the logic exactly?
and then forever after auto win against him.
or
have very reliable dash+cc combo (read: targetable). If required stacks would be halved for melee, it would just make the simplest of melees stronger and dominant over more challanging melee champions, because they would have BY FAR the easiest time stacking it.
is different because the difference between fully stacked and almost-full-stacked is less drastic.
(and sometimes
)
. because most AA type melee's do only physical damage so them shredding MR is pointless and if they buff it too much
, but unless she gets a kit change. Then everyone is going to keep playing her for burst over DPS.