I think that we should have 10 bans in total. Everyone will get a turn to ban one champion. It would go as such:
1______2 3______4 5______6 7______8 9______10
Now everyone is happy. No more "You didnt ban FIZZ?!?! GG i'ma feed" Now its actually a team game, everyone will have a say. Not "What the first pick does not want to play against's game". Thoughts?
poopoo peepee4 votesInb4 1st pick calls Daius top, so 3rd pick bans Darius because they didn't get top.
Clint Orris2 votesor just call top.....?
IwfiKe3qjM2 votes10 ban... the only obvious change will be 20 owned champions requirement instead of 16... Q_Q
(even I'm below 30... I don't think I'll get 16 before 30... even 20... since I want to saved IP for Runes until 20...)
WiegrafOfValor1 votesYou'll get there brother.. Trust me, we will gonna need more bans.
IwfiKe3qjM1 votesof course sooner or later there will be more bans as champion pool gets larger... and because of that, requirement champion to draft pick got increased too...
WiegrafOfValor1 votesI like the idea, democracy and we really need more bans.. It's getting ridiculous
AMYS GRAVE1 votesbans 1--2 4--3 5--6 8--7 9--10
picks 10--9 7--8 6--5 3--4 2--1
thoughts?
dustwind81 votesI made this same suggestion before, and people shot it down instantly
Shadow Gilgamesh1 votesI don't know if there's enough champs in the game yet to justify upping bans from 6 to 10. That's like 8% of the champs in the game. It certainly would be FAIRER than giving all the bans to one person on each team.