Even if a champion has a high pick rate, the player who picks that champion is still going to lose approximately half their matches anyway. So, unless you know who your are playing against, as is the case with pro play, and what the success rate of each player with each champion is, banning a champion has little to no bearing on the outcome of matches.
And, besides, there are far many too choose from nowadays.
DuskDaUmbreon3 votesBanning counters or personal problem champions seems a fairly good use to me.
Sure the bans aren't as strategic as in coordinated play, but they're not useless - Their use is just shifted.
Accursêd2 votesor there are broken champions that should be banned until theyre nerfed
letsfeedtogether1 votesYa... no.
FOR JUSTICE1 votesIt does actually. Example, if you draft a team of 
then there actually isn't a single point in the game your team can actually lose.
Or if your team is a burst heavy comp and the enemy locks in 
Certain picks and comps have no counterplay regardless if drafted in the right conditions, hence the purpose of banning champions.
GreenKnight1 votesNah, if i can remove at least one rework from the match, it's a win for me.
