Dark Harvest is healthier than conqueror.
Title.
Title.
Nice argumentations, wow I never saw it from that perspetive, you should have definetly put up a TL:DR to sum up the in-depth analysis you made.
Hard agree.
This is a fuck no. A scaling execute that's usable on anyone and activates on just dealing any kind of damage to someone at 50% HP, and currently deals absurd amounts of damage in early and mid game (which is getting hella nerfed on the PBE) is not better the Conquerer. Maybe after they finish nerfing Dark Harvest into oblivion it will be, but as it sits right now, NO.
This is a fuck no. A scaling execute that's usable on anyone and activates on just dealing any kind of damage to someone at 50% HP, and currently deals absurd amounts of damage in early and mid game (which is getting hella nerfed on the PBE) is not better the Conquerer. Maybe after they finish nerfing Dark Harvest into oblivion it will be, but as it sits right now, NO.
To be fair, with how fast games are ending, something that scales tends to suck nowadays.
[{quoted}](name=Malix Farwin,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=nG43O6W9,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2018-11-30T16:51:12.355+0000)
To be fair, with how fast games are ending, something that scales tends to suck nowadays.
Yes, but scaling things shouldn't be coming online so hard so early. This is problematic because it's adding way too much burst early game and mid game, when champions don't have the HP built up to deal with heavy burst, and it becomes unbearable if games drag out.
So a flat, constant scaling buff is healthier than a buff you have to constantly aa for? What sense does that make?
Agree, darkharvest makes this game exiting again... it’s the only reason I’m still playing
No
Comment.