Is THAT much CS that important?????
I just went 6/0/15 as Ez with 150 farm in 20 minutes and got an A+ my Akali went 12/1/10 with 100 farm in that time and got an A-
We completely shit on everyone we faced
What more do you want??
I just went 6/0/15 as Ez with 150 farm in 20 minutes and got an A+ my Akali went 12/1/10 with 100 farm in that time and got an A-
We completely shit on everyone we faced
What more do you want??
You had 141 in a 25 min game. That's incredibly low for the role. Akali had a whopping 89.
The CS is abysmal. Yes, it matters.
Edit: You also placed/destroyed few wards and bought no pinks. That's a factor as well afaik
If enemies surrender at 20 or have an afk or rage quitter, it lowers your grade significantly.
In my experience, it's harder to get an S in a 20 minute game than a 35 minute game.
Don't forget kill participation. If their kills and assists weren't often related to each other then that means that their participation was actually fairly low, especially if other members of their team were getting a lot of kills without them.
It's important if you want that S, as well as other factors like warding and yes the KDA as well
why do you not think cs matters ? how do you gain gold and experience and push turrets and create pressure on the map to force neutral objectives?
about ever 13 cs = a kill
Yeah well I was ripping 13 cs out of their assholes all game and Riot still didn't care
the point of the game isnt KILLS and DAMAGE this isnt COD or MORTAL COMBAT
its a strategy based moba... you could (not likely ) win just by out csing and getting objectives and not kill your enemy
ummmm, you do realize you're arguing with a blue, right? XD
they are volunteers, but there must be some qualifications required for the job
what are you talkign about ?
I forget what they called them but they're volunteers who try to explain to the playerbase riot's thought process without actually doing the impossible, so they only give us what they can and nothing definite.
they're basically like a lawyer before you get to the judge (reds)
i know what a blue is . its a curator but where am i arguing with one ?
... you poor, poor noob.
Everyone has a blue highlight around their name when they're the one that made the original post.
Arbiters have blue text for their name on the boards they moderate.
Isn't that kind of both a conflict of interest(as it now displaces the credit of blue names just by association) and it's only been that way for less than a week. Gee, such noobism
next thing you know they'll highlight them in red...
green, yellow, gold, checkered, anything...would have been better than blue
I don't discredit that I did not know this, but it is very, very recent...
and it's only been that way for less than a week
I don't discredit that I did not know this, but it is very, very recent...
The OP's name being highlighted in blue has been the same since the Boards were released, so several years at this point. The Arbiter's name being blue text has been the same since the Arbiters were announced, which is closer to a year.
So no, not that recent at all.
I think the only time a different color is used to highlight is when the OP is a Rioter.
Farm does seem to have a large factor in grading. Which seem silly for certain champions, especially as someone who prefers jungling. I've had matches with extremely high kill participation, objectives, and minimal deaths although limited farm due to helping often and always got a lower grade for it. On the other hand I can just choose not to help my team as much to get that farm and end up with a better grade because reasons.
both games.
5/10/17 -- I went 5/1/4 and got 62 cs, I got an S+.
5/19/17 -- I went 30/6/6 and got 210 cs, I got an A.
Man, CS doesn't mean shit. It's all about how much you don't die.
[{quoted}](name=Milodic Mellodi,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=idb3ujPE,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2017-05-20T05:28:10.378+0000)
both games. 5/10/17 -- I went 5/1/4 and got 62 cs, I got an S+. 5/19/17 -- I went 30/6/6 and got 210 cs, I got an A.
Man, CS doesn't mean shit. It's all about how much you don't die.
time also factored into ur cs/min xd
Uhh, didn't he post they died 1 time for akali and 0 times for EZ? Obviously it's not that important. Lol
[{quoted}](name=Milodic Mellodi,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=idb3ujPE,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2017-05-20T05:28:10.378+0000)
both games. 5/10/17 -- I went 5/1/4 and got 62 cs, I got an S+. 5/19/17 -- I went 30/6/6 and got 210 cs, I got an A.
Man, CS doesn't mean shit. It's all about how much you don't die.
I'm guessing that first game was won in 20m or less... and the second one was a full game.
theres more than just cs and kda
Deaths (especially the first 3 or 4; if you can prevent those you will have a much better chance at an S), CS (at least 8 per minute if not 10), and game time are the most important (in my opinion). Objectives are slightly important but if you have enough CS it doesn't really matter.
If the enemy FF's or it's a 5v4, you probably won't get an S.
If you END the game in under 20 minutes though, without a surrender, that greatly increases your grade.
In terms of grading, there is no difference between 7/1/10 and 1239109477315/1/47865193479523. Both of those scores are worthy of S+ in the category of KDA. Giving points in categories that aren't KDA wouldn't make sense. You have to score well in multiple categories.
Wow, snowballing is so hard. But CS and rotating is easy, right?