The old Aatrox was a lazy copout, and here's the simple truth why

The Ecdysiast··3 votes·493 views

His passive was just a generic revival like Anivia Anivia His Q was a less reliable Xin E, despite the small AoE, having less range and not being targeted XinZhao His W was also a less reliable Xin W, because instead of both damage and healing you had to choose between them XinZhao His E was an Anivia Q minus the stun and synergy hers has with her other abilities Anivia His ultimate was a Yi ultimate minus the movespeed and slow immunity. MasterYi

Old Aatrox was far less unique than the new design, and the fact he was an amalgamation of weakened versions of other champion's abilities that didn't go together is exactly why he was never the best man for the job. Xin, Udyr, Yi, Jax, Vi, and Shyvanna could all always do better than him at his intended purpose.

The only time he's ever performed well is right this very moment, thanks to the removal of his W cost combined with Conqueror-- which they'll either nerf or buff other runes to match its strength.

It's purely coincidental that his rework timed just right with an overpowered rune making him finally a decent pick, since the team in charge of champion reworks isn't the same team that deals with runes. If they had held off the release a month or two, or been ready a month earlier then it would've been right when Aatrox was garbage again.

2 Comments

AirKingNeo1 votes

???????

Aatrox's revive with a condition. His passive also gave attack speed.

Yi's ult doesn't give attack range.

Not even gonna try the rest.

WoadKethunt1 votes

aatrox was designed for a meta that riot at the time hated, he was also nerfed into the ground along with some core items that he was balanced around being removed from the game

More from Gameplay

More by The Ecdysiast