They don't have to build a 
or 
to scale properly, they can deal supplemental damage with their basic attacks, they can viably build lifesteal, and they melt turrets faster than Ap casters.
The only reason to take an AP caster over AD is to prevent armor stacking...
There's my rant, hope you enjoyed.
R31W1NG4 votesyou say rant but you mean fact.
legionnaire991 votesName one ad spell caster that has a strong late game?
xBushx1 votesLucian/Corki/Ezreal....
I have others but figured I would rifle off those three quick.
legionnaire991 votesLucian compared to other adc has a super low winrate after 25 minutes and it only drops after Corki is the 3 lowest winrate over Urgot ( a ad caster) and klista which get nurfed lol Ezreal is balanced in my mine and his winrate is 50% it's a fact that adc that use basic attack out class there caster play type
xBushx1 votesYou asked for strong casters...All of the ones i listed can ONE combo kill the opposing adc late game. Winrate means nothing beside "Strength" if that was the case we would ONLY see nerfs/buffs based on this...
legionnaire991 votesWinrate =/= strong I do not understand I can understand one game a team just doesn't play good but that the overall rate of winning which mean they must be stronger then the other laners
xBushx1 votesIf that was the case then we wouldnt see constant nerfs of sub 50% winrate champs...this happens all the time. Mostly due to future balance decisions.
On the whole AD casters are fine.
That was where my initial argument comes into effect.
Pierce The Veal1 votes[{quoted}](name=x Bush x,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=hiVLH2GL,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2016-04-11T13:23:08.002+0000)
Lucian/Corki/Ezreal....
I have others but figured I would rifle off those three quick.
Woah even AD casters are getting replaced by ADCs.
