Warwick's damage isn't the problem

Kingsgrave·Nov 23, 2014·2 votes·562 views

his utility/safety is. Giving AS, 30% LS on R and MS+sight to those under 50% needs to be hit b4 damage.

You can ult anyone anywhere because you get so much Lifesteal from the R + passive and botrk that you are pretty much guaranteed to kill the target and make it out alive.

You give a ridiculous amount of free gold to allies that helps way too well with pushing, sieging, dragoning and baroning.

Your E has no real downtime or real cost to have toggled on and gives you sight + bonus MS against any targets with less than 50% health. Why this isn't something like 10-15% is beyond me.

Yet people just want to gut devourer, R damage and R Cooldown instead of fixing his real problems.

Figures.

5 Comments

Lover LipsNov 23, 20143 votes

All displacement spells/cc in the game laugh at a ww that dares try to ult in the middle of a team with no cd's.

it baffles me what goes through people's heads when they complain about champions that are played maybe once or twice in a year and do well... sounds like they don't know what they're talking about.

KingsgraveNov 23, 20141 votes

All displacement spells/cc in the game laugh at a ww that dares try to ult in the middle of a team with no cd's.

it baffles me what goes through people's heads when they complain about champions that are played maybe once or twice in a year and do well... sounds like they don't know what they're talking about.

http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/comps/by-winrate

Dr Clueless PhDNov 23, 20142 votes

Yeah, his winrate is high. But, all of the things you listed have been a part of his kit for a MUCH longer time than he's been strong. Don't complain about the way he's always been because the jungle changes have been favorable to him. Set your sights in the right direction.

Lover LipsNov 24, 20141 votes

The point of that link was null and void the moment I saw it was a "Gold" winrate. Gold winrates do not mean anything... in fact I don't think that even exists...