Ultimate abilities are called ultimate for a reason

The Ecdysiast·Oct 24, 2017·3 votes·599 views

So it makes sense that the cases of Malphite's, Vi's, and Warwick's ultimate abilities should be immune to Poppy's W. However, Warwick's Q should not be granted that same immunity. It damages, heals, and applies on hit effects while also being able to latch on to every champion in the game through flash and all movement. Her W should stop it as a special case against its displacement immunity, not the other way around.

Don't know why people would hate on one interaction for Poppy when she is neither overpowered nor overpicked right now.

9 Comments

PrismalDawnOct 24, 20172 votes

ok kid

The EcdysiastOct 24, 20171 votes

{quoted}

ok kid

Well there's really no reason this isn't the case. And Poppy is in no position for people to argue that she can't have this.

I have no choice if people start the thread with downvotes, because then more reasonable people won't even see it.

ModThe DjinnOct 24, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Well there's really no reason this isn't the case. And Poppy is in no position for people to argue that she can't have this.

I think this case is fine, honestly. WW's Q being unstoppable isn't an issue in 99% of circumstances (and is frankly needed in many of them), and making a specific rule for Poppy that she ignores ONE specific form of unstoppable but not ALL forms of unstoppable gets into really weird edge cases and might be a coding problem in the future.

The EcdysiastOct 25, 20171 votes

[{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=fTM8yqeQ,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2017-10-24T13:26:57.836+0000)

I think this case is fine, honestly. WW's Q being unstoppable isn't an issue in 99% of circumstances (and is frankly needed in many of them), and making a specific rule for Poppy that she ignores ONE specific form of unstoppable but not ALL forms of unstoppable gets into really weird edge cases and might be a coding problem in the future.

The other forms of unstoppable are not dashes. And his Q frankly should not be unstoppable as it is a movement ability.

Making a specific rule for Poppy's W where one dash ignores it but most don't is a little ridiculous.

VoidStaresBackOct 25, 20171 votes

No, all the other unstoppable ones are dashes as well. Malphite's ult is a dash, Hecarim's ult is a dash, Shyvana ult is a dash, Warwick ult is a dash, Vi ult is a dash, etc.

ModThe DjinnOct 25, 20171 votes

{quoted}

The other forms of unstoppable are not dashes. And his Q frankly should not be unstoppable as it is a movement ability.

Making a specific rule for Poppy's W where one dash ignores it but most don't is a little ridiculous.

Huh? Shyvana ult, Vi ult, Malphite ult, and Hecarim ult are all dashes. They're dashes with other effects, but any ground-targeted skillshot non-blink is a dash. Even Kled ult and Sion ult count as dashes, albeit odd ones.

GlîtchyOct 24, 20172 votes

Things Poppy CANNOT stop,

Shyvana dragon (when she dives),

WW ult (tho it gets a funny glitch sometimes where he flies straight up out of view and starts his ult animation)

Vi ult,

Malphite ult,

And Diana ult.

All of these either have "untargetable" or prevent displacement

Hovering HentaiOct 24, 20172 votes

Diana's ult is not unstoppable Poppy's W will block the first dash but not the second if Diana landed her Q as Poppy can only stop one dash from a champion

Diana Akali and Ahri's first dash is always blocked but the next ones can all get through

AsamasOct 24, 20171 votes

WW's Q actually takes some skill. His ulty, too. Poppy I am sorry but it's not too hard. Malph's R "unstoppable", Vi's R "unstoppable", WW's R "unstoppable". They can't be stoped by Poppy's W not beacuse they are ultimates but because they are "unstoppable". Read the descriptions of the abilities first. And as fars as I know Poppy's W blocks only dashes and as far as I know WW's Q is not a dash. It's just have the effect to stick to moving champions. You are a Poppy player and thats why you want that buff.