I will never understand why some champions get to stay toxic, while others dont

Succubús GF··2 votes·273 views

This title may be misleading but let me elaborate. Some champions are toxic, think lb, she got the nerf hammer for being too much of a bully, despite having some counterplay. Her ability to bully was considered toxic gameplay, and got nerfed. Ekko, however receives a free "oops i made a mistake" re-do button while also being able to be a bully to many champions. As another example, i believe xin has been strong since before sated devourer. In this time, i cant recall a time where he was considered "bad". He is very linear, very snow ball-y. In my opinion he is a little bit overpowered, and now thanks to bork buffs (thanks riot, rip any non ad champion again) he can easily do tons of damage with little counterplay, other than, you guessed it "cc". But cc counters everything so that point is highly irrelevant. Yi does the same shit. There are champions out there, like taliyah, syndra, lissandra, urgot, etc. that can be good and even useful sometimes, but can never snowball as hard, never can carry a game as hard, and when somehow, SOMEHOW, are good for the moment and make it in pro play, NERF HAMMER (Poppy )

2 Comments

MLDzXnRRR2 votes

Ekko - melee and takes damage for free when he tries to CS. You don't win a lane with Ekko vs good players. You have to roam and gank. Xin and Yi - pretty bad champions, because they are predictable, need farm, need to play vs teams without huge burst, so they don't get 1shotted when they come close, need not to get permaCCed by the enemy tank and support. I've seen Xin picked once or twice in competitive some years ago and he was completely useless.

TheJakeinator1 votes

Because some champions being strong arent a direct cancer to the game. Take Leblanc, she is a direct cancer when strong who wins every matchup she is up against. Ekko however got one of his builds nerfed because Tank ekko was toxic but AP isn't.

More from Gameplay

More by Succubús GF