Jungle is the reason for everyone loss in this game

XJ99999999999999·May 26, 2019·5 votes·2,268 views

and every lane plays 100% perfect.

Jungle can be 3-0-1, do a risky dragon and get it, but because they didn't go back top for a "Free kill" or help bot after dragon with no ult - sub 30% hp it means you are terrible.

Meanwhile laners can go 0-5, get out roamed, never shove while their opponent roams, never wards, never calls mia.

NO ONE ever blames any laner for anything. ITS THE JUNGLERS FAULT!

If this game had no jungle and just another lane, I wonder what the new excuse for feeding would be.

7 Comments

JusKilMay 26, 20192 votes

{quoted}

and every lane plays 100% perfect.

Jungle can be 3-0-1, do a risky dragon and get it, but because they didn't go back top for a "Free kill" or help bot after dragon with no ult - sub 30% hp it means you are terrible.

Meanwhile laners can go 0-5, get out roamed, never shove while their opponent roams, never wards, never calls mia.

NO ONE ever blames any laner for anything. ITS THE JUNGLERS FAULT!

If this game had no jungle and just another lane, I wonder what the new excuse for feeding would be.

yeah i feel you completely. Happens all the time but now it feels a lot worse because of how hard it is to maneuver around for xp, especially in a bad jung match up. It really just doesnt have enough reward right now to warrant all the trouble especially when your team doesnt see that

The thigh guyMay 26, 20191 votes

Because nothing is ever the laners fault. It’s the junglers fault the adcs ass itches and the mid laners dog is barking.

NexonKimMay 26, 20191 votes

{quoted}

and every lane plays 100% perfect.

Jungle can be 3-0-1, do a risky dragon and get it, but because they didn't go back top for a "Free kill" or help bot after dragon with no ult - sub 30% hp it means you are terrible.

Meanwhile laners can go 0-5, get out roamed, never shove while their opponent roams, never wards, never calls mia.

NO ONE ever blames any laner for anything. ITS THE JUNGLERS FAULT!

If this game had no jungle and just another lane, I wonder what the new excuse for feeding would be.

BECAUSE NOBODY FUCKING WANTS TO PLAY GODDAMN JUNGLE

I HAVE PRIMARY SUPPORT SECONDARY FILL BUT I ALWAYS FUCKING GET JUNGLE WHEN I HAVE 0 JUNGLERS FUCK RYOU RIOT

Must be because riot keeps bringing players like me who have no idea how to jungle into forced to play jungle even though my primary is support

WalkingInACircleMay 26, 20191 votes

Yes, you do have to gank.

XJ99999999999999May 26, 20193 votes

{quoted}

Yes, you do have to gank.

Yes, I do gank, but I can't gank all 3 lanes at once sorry.

I also can't gank for you if you feed 3 kills in a row within 10 seconds of arriving in lane and lose a huge wave every time SOLO.

Fear the KaynMay 26, 20191 votes

These days jungle is BY FAR the most autofilled roll in the game, much moreso than support. This leads to more unexperienced junglers in our games. Any time I queue for fill these days its always jungle. Riot has overnerfed jungle the past few years for no good reason, honestly, and not many people want to play it.

AnaphielMay 27, 20191 votes

Jungling is more stressful than performing invasive brain surgery whilst dead drunk with zero medical expertise.

In an effort to curb the incidence of early gank oppression, Riot has nerfed jungle exp to the point that any failure to obtain a commanding lead results in you becoming a caster minion whilst your team collectively signs your death warrant.

However, supports and junglers have always been the resident blame-buckets for the folks that don't want to admit that they were pushed up too far without vision, or that by the time they have fed over three kills, there is nothing any jungler on the planet can reasonably do other than abandon that lane to their fate and attempt to make SOMETHING happen somewhere else on the map.

Most junglers agree: Ya usually don't want to gank lanes that are losing too hard, as it usually wastes valuable time, and wastes feeding a double/triple to the already large opposing lane.