[{quoted}](name=Dominick Destine,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=cbOoEuyl,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2016-02-08T02:23:47.537+0000)
Strawman argument/ad hominem.
Nice try though.
Nirvana fallacy.
Good try, but failed once again. The fact that perfection cannot be achieved does not mean broken characters must not be nerfed into balanced levels.
you picked a single line and ignored the rest, I didn't not disagree that a broken character must be nerfed into balanced levels, I was asking WHAT is the cut off point for balanced champions? 53% win rate with high pick rate? 54%? I was not disputing your argument about udyr needing a nerf, I was asking on what guide line do you decide what has passed into the the realm of broken, not to argue, but out of curiosity about your way of deciding that the statistics say one or the other.
obviously you wouldn't call everything that is 51% win rate and above average pickrate OP, or anything below 49% and below average pick rate under powered.
out of pure curiosity, where do you think is the statistic high balance point where beyond it one becomes over powered, and the statistic low point where one becomes under powered?