Naut was gutted into complete unplayability for being oppressive - and hey, I get that
What I don't get is why this argument doesn't work for other champions, many of who have far more oppresive lane phase.
No other champion in history of LoL was completely Evelynn-ized for being a lane bully.
was kind-of similar case, but Naut's state was nowhere near as absurd (80% banrate just REQUIRES action) and even he wasn't nerfed into such dysfunctional state.
Right now Nautilus can only be played as support - which I absolutely wouldn't mind - but even there mana issues stop him from having any impact, He just doesn't get immediately rekted as a support, because there is another champion in botlane to clear the wave.
So if getting essentially removed from the game - because that's what happened, Naut just doesn't have mana utilize his kit and Riot was perfectly aware of that when they commited the nerf - for being a lane bully is a thing, why is say
only patted at back of his head with Riot acknowleding that he has to bully to function?
Is bullying allowed, or is it not?
Makes him bursty enough to murder a carry and then regen off of warmog to full.
/
and go for on hit nautilus, but I like the burn on his w.
could easily be made viable again tbqh