PSA: Bronze players do not have as good gameplay as Diamond players
Their knowledge and application of game-skill is inferior.
Thank you.
Their knowledge and application of game-skill is inferior.
Thank you.
Willing to bet you're salty
I have 0% salt in my e-organism.
I am like a rock. I am hardened. Unflappable , in these veins, nothing but ice water and steel. No one can make me feel even 1% upset.
Yep. Salty.
Also not very knowledgeable of science.
I sense you are projecting.
Dem irony / you are salty.
Your "arguments" in that other thread really beg to differ.
I honestly don't think such values of salt are healthy for an organism of such lowly stature.
I hope the irony of your statements in conjunction with your link is not lost on intelligent readers.
Checkmate
PSA: Monkeys throw poop in order to scent their adversaries.
i laughed
All hail the goddamn diamond overlord. :/
Professors are smarter than 8th graders.
So obviously Professors should tell everyone that 8th graders are dumbasses and are inferior intellectually. Cause, ya know, logic.
Professors are smarter than 8th graders.
So obviously Professors should tell everyone that 8th graders are dumbasses and are inferior intellectually. Cause, ya know, logic.
i agree, not sure how his post actually helps anyone
So obviously Professors should tell everyone that 8th graders are dumbasses and are inferior intellectually. Cause, ya know, logic.
Except that's not what his argument was. A better analogy would be;
Professors are more intelligent and world-wise than children. Therefore, when children try to demand a major change to something of which they have absolutely no knowledge of .... their opinion should be dismissed in favor of the professors who actually do have knowledge and experience with the field in question.
Child: "LET'S HAVE CHOCOLATE FOR EVERY MEAL" Professor: "No" Child: "ZMOG WTF DISCRINATORY"
That's not how you phrased it. A direct translation to my original analogy would be:
PSA: 8th Graders Are Not As Smart As Professors Their knowledge is inferior. Thank you.
No mention of any other argument. Also, the way you wrote the original post, the professor would most likely respond more like "No. You know nothing and are just 7 year old stuck in childhood". Not the best thing to say when you are trying to teach a child to be mature or learn what is right.
“The study of the child… may have an infinitely wider influence, extending to all human questions. In the mind of the child we may find the key to progress….” (The Secret of Childhood, p. 3)
That's not how you phrased it.
Of course that's not "how I phrased it", I was responding to someone else's analogy.
It's not complicated.... your argument was flimsy and got decimated with ease.
I'm not going to argue this. Let up/down votes speak :/
If your right, ill respect that and acknowledge the votes. If not, likewise you to me hopefully.
I'm not going to argue this.
Because you have no argument to present, you got slammed.
I believe that's his line.
oh snap!
the difference between bronze and diamond skill level is so absurdly huge that you would have to have played a lot of games in each bracket to understand.
I have a bronze, silver, gold, plat and diamond account. So technically, my bronze account can match your diamond account.
Sport coaches shouldn't be coaches because they can't play the sport for shit.
Am I doing this right?
What is a "False Equivalency" for 500 Alex
[{quoted}](name=Dominick Destine,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Z7p9RXvF,comment-id=000d0000,timestamp=2016-01-27T20:33:57.274+0000)
What is a "False Equivalency" for 500 Alex
How is it false? Coaches don't play as well as the players do. So why should they get to be coaches?
Yeah, no, but actually, could you elaborate on that? Because sure "Diamond are better than Bronze", of course they are. But I'm pretty sure that someone who's interested in game design, game theory and all, but that doesn't bother try-harding to climb the ladder would be as knwoledgeable and a member of the forum community as valuable as a mechanics-god who just spammed a snowballing hard-carry in soloQ and managed to reach 2 divisions higher than the first one.
[slayer-pantheon-rainbows]
Well, I've been in bronze, been in silver, and been in gold. While I've never been in plat or diamond, I've played against people who were currently in that ELO -- and I held my own, other than a top Vayne into my Gnar (can we fucking nerf her, please?). Hell, when I first started, I went against a plat Azir (didn't know at the time) who had 3k+ games and actually won lane and had a pretty good KDA. After the game, one of my teammates asked if I was a smurf, and explained that the Azir was super experienced and all that.
And, I've spectated diamond games and challenger games... you know what differences I see? Very few. People play their champs a bit better, but still do the same, stupid things. Die to the same things. Win with CC spam. All that. So, sure, there may be a slight mechanical difference, but, ultimately, it's more of the same. Your ELO is largely based on your luck in matchmaking and your teamcomp -- being good actually doesn't mean much.
And, I've spectated diamond games and challenger games... you know what differences I see? Very few.
You know why that is? their opponents are other diamonds/challengers.
Put those people against you or other bronze/silver/gold...and the B/S/G would get utterly stomped 10 times out of 10.
Well, what about the diamonds / plats I've gone against? Only one ever handed me my ass.
"I once beat Scarra mid, I left him 0-5 during laning and did it while only using one hand, without my glasses, with a broken monitor, in bed, with my massive..... intelligence"
You'll forgive me if I disbelieve your fake story.
[{quoted}](name=Dominick Destine,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Z7p9RXvF,comment-id=0005000000000000,timestamp=2016-01-25T23:53:55.936+0000)
"I once beat Scarra mid, I left him 0-5 during laning and did it while only using one hand, without my glasses, with a broken monitor, in bed, with my massive..... intelligence"
You'll forgive me if I disbelieve your fake story.
well, it sometimes happens, even more so when people play champs for the first time in normals and not try as hard, so he could be telling the truth.
Dear friend, if you beat a diamond in lane, you have to fear, because he has yet to show you how he got to diamond.
If I beat a diamond Riven who has several hundred games on Riven... I think I know how they got there. Thing is, diamond players just aren't all that much better. They just know how to exploit what Riot fucked up a bit better.
Wrong, they use game knowledge instead of mechanics. I played games against diamonds that lost lanes, they had exceptional objective control, map pressure and awareness. They pushed 3 lanes at once without extending a single moment, forcing us to clear waves while they were taking dragon and baron. We could just watch as they manipulated the game flow.
They are that much better.
Lol. I play regularly with a challenger and I'm a gold whos been told I can probly reach mid plat if I tried.
And I will admit he ABSOLUTLY DESTROYS ME. In game knowledge. In mechanics. In champ select. In builds.
In literally every aspect of the game.
I've seen him pull off such amazing plays that it isn't even funny.
And the kicker is he manages to do it almost every single game I play with him.
Oh I also play with bronzies alot to because alot of my freinds are bot.
He's even beat 5 bronzies in a 2v5 custom game and he wasn't even playing his main.
what i hate the most is when people try to give they worthless opinion about something they have no clue on. exemple : Silver 2 champion games : 0 ' i think we should rework cassio because ... ( bullshits argues )... bla bla '
[zombie-brand-facepalm]
i should not care but ... but what if riot listen to them ?
Cool?
So what?
Yes. It's true that those in diamond are much, much better than me, seeing as i'm in bronze. That's obvious. However, it doesn't mean that people in diamond can treat me like dirt just because they are better at a computer-game than me.
Their application of mechanics are inferior, surely. Their knowledge, I'm not so sure. Also, congratz on phrasing your question so it's impossible to disagree with you even if you're talking sh*t. -1
phrasing your question so it's impossible to disagree
That's nice, except I didn't ask any questions.
[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]
You added a poll to your thread. In this poll, you put a question.
I'm trying really hard to not insult your intelligence but you don't make it easy...
The predetermined answers suck the air out of your argument.
It's not complicated, if you want to vote no, the choice is clearly marked... but if you were unable to see it , that's fine too.
[slayer-jinx-wink]
most diamon players ELO BOOSTED*[slayer-jinx-wink]*
As a former Bronze player, let me prove you wrong. Provide me with a PC and a Diamond account and I will climb to Challenger while you remain in Diamond, you Diamond scrub! :)
Voted "yes" just because you're an idiot. Nobody cares.
2 words no. shit.
2 words no. shit.
Have you seen the results of the poll and the comments so far?
Some Bronzies arent as good as Diamonds in general, but what about players like me who were in Bronze forever but have a sizable grasp of the Champions and their styles?