Can Dragons/Heralds/Barons Taken matter more in our Mastery Score?

Hey friends,

I think it'd be a great if our rating improved noticeably if we're playing as the Jungler and we successfully capture multiple Dragons/Heralds/Barons throughout a game. As a Jungler, my role is to not only help my laners, but also control objectives and ensure we obtain benefits from them throughout a game. If I lead to the taking of three dragons and a baron throughout a game as the Jungler, shouldn't that be reflected more heavily in the post-game Mastery Score?

Furthermore, Epic Monsters are far more valuable than the average creep and obtaining a subpar Mastery Score because our creep score was lower than average (due to a difference in priority) feels really bad. I feel that controlling objectives and taking towers does not matter as much as it should in our Champion Mastery Rating, compared to having a high K/D/A and especially high Creep Score. In other words, I feel like some of the factors that win games are not being considered as heavily on our Mastery Score as they should.

What are the Boards' (or some Rioters') thoughts on this idea? Of course, last-hitting them could mislead the score , so I think it would be important that the score examined Damage Dealt to Epic Monsters and Objectives more so than whether or not the Jungler/Laner got the Capture/Assist.

Please make a constructive response if you downvote. I'm a reasonable person and would like a discussion on this matter. **Remember that downvoting should only be used for removing threads that do not promote discussion or do no contribute, not as a method of disagreement. **