Assassins shouldn't have MR per level
so their weakness against poke in mid lane is more pronounced thus making them easier to deal with early
don't have MR per level for this very reason
Why do these champs still have it?:


so their weakness against poke in mid lane is more pronounced thus making them easier to deal with early
don't have MR per level for this very reason
Why do these champs still have it?:


Melees as a rule have MR per level except for a FEW exceptions (Kassadin doesn't because his passive works as level 18 MR per level for the entire game, Yasuo has his passive shield and W, etc.). Most of those assassins you listed are melee, and thus have MR a level (and no, LeBlanc and Ahri don't).
[{quoted}](name=Lord Dusteon,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=UhfjrrpN,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-03-16T19:39:25.863+0000)
Melees as a rule have MR per level except for a FEW exceptions (Kassadin doesn't because his passive works as level 18 MR per level for the entire game, Yasuo has his passive shield and W, etc.). Most of those assassins you listed are melee, and thus have MR a level (and no, LeBlanc and Ahri don't).
But why is it a rule?
But why is it a rule?
Because they are melee? Because melees have to gapclose to do damage while Ranged can hang back?
If a champion is melee, their skills tend to be stronger and their base stats are higher.
ALL mages and markmans shouldn't have ARMOR per level.