“It’s Urf” is not an excuse to troll build

50CaliberHecate·Jun 28, 2018·1 votes·1,436 views

Literally build AD on an AP champion just cause it is “urf” isn’t an excuse. Seriously, wanna do that shit, go to bots. I like winning games, not being trolled in them

9 Comments

DrCyanideJun 28, 20184 votes

Actually, yes, it is an excuse to try stuff like that. You're basing your assumptions on what is the most optimal for champions off of how they behave without 80% CDR. For some champions with channeled abilities (such as Xerath or Fiddlesticks ) it would be worse to build AP than to build AD, since they aren't able to use all their abilities as fast as URF requires.

50CaliberHecateJun 28, 20181 votes

but if you're end game score is 2/16 because you have an "off-meta" build and choose to dive in and basically feed, I'm reporting you. Like this seems to be the common pattern. I can understand building off-meta so as long as it is actually benefiting you or the team, however intentionally feeding cause it's "urf" and using "off-meta" builds as the excuse to why you are feeding is not an excuse.

DrCyanideJun 28, 20183 votes

People can end up with low kills and high deaths when they stick to "on-meta" builds.

Intentional Feeding is very different than trying something new and it not working out. You seem to be missing that distinction.

Vah NaborisJun 29, 20181 votes

{quoted}

Actually, yes, it is an excuse to try stuff like that. You're basing your assumptions on what is the most optimal for champions off of how they behave without 80% CDR. For some champions with channeled abilities (such as or ) it would be worse to build AP than to build AD, since they aren't able to use all their abilities as fast as URF requires.

??? fiddlesticks are no issue spamming E and Q they have virtually no cast times and his ult is a blink

DrCyanideJun 29, 20181 votes

W doesn't deal damage any faster in URF than it does in normal games (a liability in URF), and the tenacity buffs make Q and E less effective than they would be.