Winrate OVER playrate is what matters, not just winrate.
Last season pre-rework Yorick was played once in challenger and was 100% winrate. Do you really think he needed nerfs?
Last season pre-rework Yorick was played once in challenger and was 100% winrate. Do you really think he needed nerfs?
Neither formula has any basis in statistics. Correlation does not equal to causation regardless.
probably the meta slave Voyboy did it.
Last season pre-rework Yorick was played once in challenger and was 100% winrate. Do you really think he needed nerfs?
In which case, there are a few champions that deserve nerfs alongside 
the current PBE is nothing but a bunch of AIDS.
30:50
Playrate vs winrate. Also keep in mind that lee sins winrate varies because hes up so far as 52% in higher korean ELOs, and down as much as 46% in lower elos. He retains a global 48% winrate and a global 30% playrate.
one of the funniest cases of a reworked champ screwing over a one trick was the case of Inverted composer
He had a 54% winrate with old yorick for 2 seasons in a row with something like over 1000 games each. he even hit challenger/master a few times
In season 6 yorick gets reworked, he tried to play him consistently in high ELO and his winrate plummeted to 50% from something like 58% (old yorick) and now in season 7 he has stopped playing yorick almost completely and now plays corki top l0l.
Thank you.
I keep saying this to everyone who calls for ahri nerfs.
Her stat number is 52/14. Meanwhile Leblanc's numbers are 54/6.
People don't call for LB nerfs do they????
I think what everyone needs to remember is that facts can be misleading.
This thread has been archived. Commenting and voting have been disabled.