Winrate OVER playrate is what matters, not just winrate.

Marshbouy··10 votes·973 views

Last season pre-rework Yorick was played once in challenger and was 100% winrate. Do you really think he needed nerfs?

8 Comments

WalkingInACircle4 votes

Neither formula has any basis in statistics. Correlation does not equal to causation regardless.

dominusx1 votes

probably the meta slave Voyboy did it.

SquashCannon1 votes

{quoted}

Last season pre-rework Yorick was played once in challenger and was 100% winrate. Do you really think he needed nerfs?

In which case, there are a few champions that deserve nerfs alongside Darius

the current PBE is nothing but a bunch of AIDS.

Paroe1 votes

LeeSin 30:50

Playrate vs winrate. Also keep in mind that lee sins winrate varies because hes up so far as 52% in higher korean ELOs, and down as much as 46% in lower elos. He retains a global 48% winrate and a global 30% playrate.

grug1 votes

one of the funniest cases of a reworked champ screwing over a one trick was the case of Inverted composer

He had a 54% winrate with old yorick for 2 seasons in a row with something like over 1000 games each. he even hit challenger/master a few times

In season 6 yorick gets reworked, he tried to play him consistently in high ELO and his winrate plummeted to 50% from something like 58% (old yorick) and now in season 7 he has stopped playing yorick almost completely and now plays corki top l0l.

doiminat0r36001 votes

Thank you.

I keep saying this to everyone who calls for ahri nerfs.

Her stat number is 52/14. Meanwhile Leblanc's numbers are 54/6.

People don't call for LB nerfs do they????

SpecterVonBaren1 votes

I think what everyone needs to remember is that facts can be misleading.

ModRito Wuks1 votes

This thread has been archived. Commenting and voting have been disabled.

More from Gameplay

More by Marshbouy