We need to help ADCS
https://i.gyazo.com/51964f68b560f0f0ea781f79ee226f47.png
they're only covering 80% of top picks
it needs to be 100% :/
https://i.gyazo.com/51964f68b560f0f0ea781f79ee226f47.png
they're only covering 80% of top picks
it needs to be 100% :/
I've posted this before somewhere else but I'll post it again:
Actually, no ADCs are not the best winrates bot lane. I dont agree with this guy but I do want it clear that ADCs are not the best bot. Quinn is dokng well but that's because shes an assassin and was actually reworked and intended for solo laning. Shes not a traditional ADC. The highest winrate champs bot lane are:
Kennen(mage with a wr of 57%) Quinn(assassin at 56%) Wukong(assassin/bruiser at 55%) Veigar(mage at just under 55%) Swain(battlemage at 53%) Xerath(mage at 53%) And finally its MF and Jhin at 53% and 52% respectively.
You have to go down six spots before you hit actual ADCs.
And I'll also add that its bullshit for you to have to go six places before hitting a marksmen in the one lane they can function and work in. They're currently getting destroyed in their own lane by champions that have multiple lanes to play in.
all those picks have between 0 and 1% pick rate, something that Mordekaiser bot lane always had and was always considered shit despite having 60% win rate wanna know why? something called low sample something that everyone on the boards knew (or i thought) Which is why OPGG takes high pick rate champions into top tier along with KDA win rate and overall pressure like CS rate
the only exeption in your list is Quinn who's gamebreaking
but she IS a marksman do you want me to list you her kit or you're willing to look at all the steroids that she gets? Just because she has burst doesn't mean she's an assassin or we should count jhin draven and mf as assassins too But assassins don't get to DPS in teamfight Quinn has a passive adding bonus damage to her AA, cooldown reduced by crit chance (in case you didn't know) W gives 80% bonus attack speed literally has 525 range and 0.668+3.1% as/lvl, you think assassins have this?
be real my friend
Quinn is in the same boat as Corki and Graves, both of which are considered separate entities from normal ADC's. This is because Quinn was reworked with the idea of being played mid instead of bot; the fact that she plays top instead is irrelevant.
As far as a small pick rate, the only thing I feel like that should be taken into account for is the general feeling of people who actually play bot lane. If they're currently only picking the only marksmen that are good and feel rewarding to play instead of picking the five or so mages that are destroying the lane, that's a clear sign that what people who actually play botlane want to play is marksmen and should be taken more into account than what people who play mid, top and jungle have to say. Play rate means zero in the face of the fact that I'm an ADC main; I want to play ADC's. If I had wanted, at any point during the time I played league, to play a mage/bruiser/tank/assassin, I would have gone out of bot lane and went to play mid/top/jungle. But I didn't do that; I stayed playing botlane on ADCs. Because that's what I want to play. Nerfing everything I want to play to try and give me diversity that I, honestly, already had isn't going to make me suddenly play mages/bruisers/tanks/assassins. Its just going to piss me off and make me feel like I'm not privy to this game.
And finally, sure, OP.GG listed this picks as being "top tier" but at the same time, many of the picks just have high play rates; Ezreal has a negative winrate but people still play him because they still just like to play him. Kai'sa also has a negative winrate but people still player her because they like to play her; that and she is a very flexible ADC that can play a multitude of builds. Jinx just got buffed but she's still doing less well than Swain or Yasuo; Swain has both a higher pick rate and higher winrate than her while Yasuo's pick and winrate are on equal footing to hers.
Miss Fortune is the only ADC champion on that "tier list" that I would consider harshly over tuned and its only because she actually likes Stormrazor and it synergizes very well with the rest of her bursty build.
My point is that just because the champions are picked more often or not does not mean that they are good. They are just the champions that people who play bot lane actually want to play and this forced diversity is actually just restricting the people who play bot lane more than ever.
Quinn is in the same boat as Corki and Graves,
and both are marksmen uhuhu
As far as a small pick rate, the only thing I feel like that should be taken into account for is the general feeling of people who actually play bot lane.
No, no and fucking no Small pick rate champions are close to irrelevant, their low sample makes them garbage and and i don't know how your "feeling" can be bad when all of them combined appears in 2% of your games which means 98% of the time you play against other champions and in a minority of it you play against non marksmen
Further more all those champions are horribly xp dependant unlike marksmen, once again proving how garbage they are but since their sample is low it fluctuates too much
And finally, sure, OP.GG listed this picks as being "top tier" but at the same time, many of the picks just have high play rates; Ezreal has a negative winrate
Ezreal is beyond fucking broken, any top tier adc player successes on him any good adc would successes on him this champion is ridiculous when it comes to balance between dealing damage and safety. his win rate is low because of the amount of games he's playing which means people with no hands will eventually play him Historically anyone with 49% win rate and top number pick rate was broken and nerfed caitlyn last season Lucian last season+right now lee sin for multiple seasons thresh for multiple seasons azir recently elise for multiple seasons jhin last season jinx 2 and 3 seasons ago
all of them without a single exception
of course some adcs are underperforming but overall the class is doing perfectly fine. It's just that some people can't afford of thinking they are possibly playing the game in a bad way , and instead of either stop caring or getting better, they blame other factors like their class being unviable when the majority of people are doing very good.
"Historically anyone with 49% win rate and top number pick rate was broken and nerfed"
Why didnt
got nerfed then? Because his win ratio is 49% and he has one of the highest pick rates right now. Why nobody talks about that?
[{quoted}](name=Astral Midnight,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=L6EyAf5t,comment-id=00020000000000000000,timestamp=2018-06-30T22:53:57.658+0000)
Why didnt
got nerfed then? Because his win ratio is 49% and he has one of the highest pick rates right now. Why nobody talks about that?
I don't know, all bruisers are broken right now anyway, look at garen with 15% pick rate and 54% win rate mundo nerf did jackshit bruisers are disgusting
part of the problem is conqueror and grasp
doesn't change what i said look at history and tell me when lee sin didn't get nerfed dude had 7 seasons of nerfs because he legit had 30% pick rate every single time except now
I don't know, all bruisers are broken right now anyway, look at garen with 15% pick rate and 54% win rate mundo nerf did jackshit bruisers are disgusting
part of the problem is conqueror and grasp
doesn't change what i said look at history and tell me when lee sin didn't get nerfed dude had 7 seasons of nerfs because he legit had 30% pick rate every single time except now
Its just odd to me why the boards dont talk about that.
No champion who had a negative win rate was nerfed for their performance in solo queue. Champions that were too prevalent in pro play, yes, garnered nerfs and a handful of the ones you mentioned literally fall under that umbrella. Specifically:
Lee Sin, Azir, Elise, and maybe Jinx though she was popular in season 5 when I was just starting league so my knowledge on that is fuzzy.
A few champions with negative solo queue wr's that did get nerfed despite it that you didn't mention also include Ryze and Galio.
Caitlyn, in my honestly opinion, was unfairly nerfed. She was never broken, she has very clear counter play in that she placed a trap there? Don't step on it. She is also largely immobile and lacks an AS steroid, meaning she doesn't scale as well as other hyper carries; what carries her in the midgame is her range and utility, much like Ashe. She got nerfed because a bunch of people gathered around and circlejerked until Riot said,"Okay fine, whatever. STFU." and gutted her. She had a high play rate but despite that she never, never broached pasted a 50% winrate.
Lucian was actually broken in previous seasons and usually gained nerfs because his WR was above 50%. He was never nerfed when he had a negative WR.
With all of this in mind, Ezreal is not currently broken; he was weakened heavily but further stat nerfs. As a skillshot based ADC he has clear weaknesses in that if he misses his skillshots, his damage is gone. The only thing I personally find frustrating about Ezreal is that his Q hit box is not very clear or clean, making it hard to dodge at times, and his E is honestly too short a CD for just how good it is. I wouldn't consider him over tuned at present time; just a league favorite, especially of Korea where OP.GG takes its stats from.
Also, how the people who actually main a role/lane feel about changes to their role or lane should matter and take precedence over the people who don't. Its like me suddenly deciding that midlane is too diverse and then making changes so that only ADCs can play there, something that has been steadily happening over the last season. I don't play midlane; why should I decide what is actually played there? Before patch 8.11, I wouldn't have magically started playing midlane either just because they make the ADC I like playing good there. I could still play them bot. Now if they decided to make changes for ADC's to be good midlane, sure, I'd play them there in a heartbeat because the place I used to play them was made systematically unfriendly toward them.
Champions that were too prevalent in pro
prevalent in pro because good players could manage to break the game with high skill champions like lee sin remember release Yasuo with 44% win rate but was picked in pro and had 30% pick rate and got nerfed over and over? yea he was definitly balanced
A few champions with negative solo queue wr's that did get nerfed despite it that you didn't mention also include Ryze and Galio.
Caitlyn, in my honestly opinion, was unfairly nerfed.
yea, in your opinion. Making more than half of the roaster unviable just by existing was fair
Also, how the people who actually main a role/lane feel about changes to their role or lane should matter
i see, no wonder riot broke the adc class for a year and made the game unfun for the other 4 roles in the game just because of whinners
Prevalent in pro play because, sure, they're high skill cap but also because people would actually build real comps around them and communicate with each other while playing them. You're just incapable of reading because I know I've proven you wrong enough that you had an entire thread deleted to avoid people seeing that I proved you wrong. .-. When you were adamant that Varus was "fine" and "viable" just because Uzi was playing him in professional play. My argument then is the same as it is now; professional play and soloqueue are not comparable and the two should honestly have separate balance patches. What is good in Professional Play will not be good in soloqueue 100% of the time. Professional teams are organized, make real goddamn team comps, have communication with their team(who they live with, train with, and play with EXTREMELY REGULARLY), and generally value different things in champions that people in soloqueue do.
And Yasuo is a shitty example and you know it. He gets nerfed over and over again because people flat out don't like him and he's got an extremely toxic kit. He could have a 0% winrate and I'd still want the bastard nerfed because he's obnoxious and unfun to play against.
A better example is, again, Ryze, who had, at one point, a 40% WR but still received a nerf because, guess what? He was still too good in pro play. His ult and the fact that he had a team around him that could specifically enable him meant that he was far too good in a professional, organized team setting. Because they could play around him and make good use of his ultimate.
And Caitlyn never invalidated half the roster. I played against her regularly during her Flavor of the Month time frame and regularly destroyed her and this is on a variety of ADC's. It was only after she got needlessly nerfed into the ground, as well, that botlane became about Hyper Carries, which everyone on the board had more issue with. What an idea; you nerf one of the best lane bullies who generally does fall off, and the people she countered get insurmountably stronger. I miss the days where she was actually viable and good because she did a fair job of checks and balances bot lane.
And I still disagree with them refusing to buff her due to feeling she'd "oppress botlane diversity" or whatever malarky while ignoring just how oppressive duo mages botlane are.
And ADC wasn't broken for a year; Supports were and this has been supported by several people across the entire board. ADCs, however, were never broken. And furthermore, this is completely taking what I said out of context and not even addressing what I did say which is that midlane/toplane/jungle have no right to say what should be played botlane considering they don't even play the role.
Someone else said it and I have to agree; all you do is cherry pick for whatever suits your agenda. Even worse, however, is that you do it under the guise that you're an ADC main but your account hasn't seen play for ages and the champs that you played on it, according to OP.GG, weren't even ADCs. How about you stop lying and cherry picking and manipulating to push your Anti-ADC agenda and come clean?
Prevalent in pro play because, sure, they're high skill cap but also because people would actually build real comps around them and communicate with each other while playing them.
Building composition around Lee sin building composition around elise, thresh
omegaLUL
And Yasuo is a shitty example and you know it.
i don't, his high skill cap kit made it so high pick rate and low win rate meant the champion was broken
A better example is, again, Ryze, who had, at one point, a 40% WR but still received a nerf because, guess what?
ryze was shit in regular, his pick rate was inexistent and never existed
And Caitlyn never invalidated half the roster. I played against her regularly
why should i care about you a single dude, instead of statistics and how the best designers know that she's an issue. All the good caitlyn players had an insane win rate no matter which adc was meta except a selected few adcs.
And I still disagree
ok
And ADC wasn't broken for a year
you mean, how they had a better midgame than lucian while outscaling him because they had 3 items at 15-20 min they totally were not!
Someone else said it and I have to agree; all you do is cherry pick for whatever suits your agenda. Even worse, however, is that you do it under the guise that you're an ADC main but your account hasn't seen play for ages and the champs that you played on it, according to OP.GG, weren't even ADCs. How about you stop lying and cherry picking and manipulating to push your Anti-ADC agenda and come clean?
I don't want to show my main account As I claimed i play Jhin Ashe Lucian since a long time now, attacking my knowledge about bot lane while only playing caitlyn is very dared I would send you a screenshot of my match history but riot has a bug with it rn
While its not professional level or "high elo" I did play a season in an Organized team in an organized tournament and yes. You do sometimes build comps around specific champions or with what specific champions can bring. If you want a pick comp, fuck yes, you're going to pick Thresh and Elise and use them. And yes, you would build a team around a Lee Sin if you wanted someone capable of easily invading the enemy jungler and controlling them while also being a real damage threat and someone who could make easy flanks and likely knock an important target out of position.
These are all things you would build a comp around; just because they aren't the main carry or anything does not mean that you're not building a comp specifically around what they can and cannot do.
And your reasoning for Yasuo is so half assed its painful. There are multiple threads from people of multiple elos who all say they hate facing Yasuo specifically because he's unfun and unenjoyable to play. Not at all because he's broken; a champion does not have to broken to be annoying.
As for why you should care, you really shouldn't. But saying that the best Caitlyn's had insane winrates on her is moronic because really? A OTP having an insane winrate on their Champion? MUST be broken. >_>; How dare they be good at their champion after putting hours and hours and hours of time into them and learning their mechanics. I was good at Tristana when Lucian, her biggest counter, was meta; must mean Tristana is broken and not that I have 900k mastery points on her and know her mechanics in and out.
And no, they weren't. How dare ADC's scale into the relative late game. Notice how they've been nerfed but games are still only 25 minutes long? That's because Riot made the games shorter; its only fair to expect every champion to spike earlier than they normally would. Many currently do in fact; just look at Fiora, Irelia, Jax, Veigar, Nasus, etc. All champions that were considered "late game" but now spike in "midgame" because midgame is late game. 20 minutes in the current meta and climate is late game.
And need I remind you that Lucian got nerfed multiple times because he's the kind of champion that finds and abuses a variety of build paths, making him far better than he should be normally? If he was doing worse than those ADCs it was because he had been nerfed down multiple times after abusing things like BoRK and Lethality; in fact, he was the poster child for the Lethality ADC meta and was incredibly over powered during it.
And you don't want to show your main account because you either A. Don't play often or B. Don't actually play ADC or C. All of the Above.
I don't play only Cait. She was one of my favorites but my best ADC has always been Tristana. Over the course of my time on the organized team, however, I put in a lot of time and hours on a variety of ADCs; I'd hazard a wider variety than you have. And I'm not afraid to screenshot my champion masteries for you:
http://i63.tinypic.com/2qnqvdf.jpg
and I even have a few tokens for Level 6 and 7 that I still haven't finished that I'm sitting on:
http://i65.tinypic.com/2nvc9if.png
So no, Cait is not my only ADC.
what do you mean caitlyn didnt deserve nerfs?? i rember last early season i was constantly banning her because how strong she was and if she was free she was gonna get picked
I mean exactly what I said. She didn't deserve nerfs. She was basically just Ezreal; sitting at a 50% winrate with an insane play rate because she's accessible and enjoyable. .-. She never broached over a 50% winrate unless you mained her, in which case you were putting in the effort to learn her mechanics and deserved to have a higher winrate; you put in the work for her.
yea and qtpie said she was disgusting xd i literally remember it was the beyondtherift with cowsep after his ban in korea
Yes, because whatever qtpie or uzi or who ever else is pro and famous says is gospel now. We can't think for ourselves and make a reasoned decision; we just have to listen what professionals say.
what they say like it or not
have way more value than anything you will say
not because of elo or ranking or anything like that because what you said since the fucking entire begining did not make any sense thinking that 0.1% pick rate is relevant thinking that your own feeling as a player is relevant which basically means "i won't be satisfied until i can 1v5" was so wrong
and if you really think it's not the case i can't help you i'll end the discussion here
My feeling as a player and a customer should be relevant, particularly since the only thing that riot would have to do to satisfy me is to give my class of champions a place in the game. I don't need the ability to 1v5 and have never once asked for that.
And you thinking that the .1% of league player's opinions matter more than the other 99.9% is far worse than me thinking that a pick rate of .1% matters enough to be addressed.
Whatever though; keep lying and manipulating and cherry picking your arguments to death.
you have some very obscure views about the role of marksman (not only this post but your presence on the boards) quinn, corki and graves are not marksman anymore and haven't been for at least 1.5 seasons now.
what a lot of people are afraid of is crit marksman getting the left in the gutter for an extended period of time like bruisers did when runes reforged came out. Riot gutted the class with the base stat nerfs and item nerfs. Its been 2 patches so far and they have gotten micro buffs which change nothing that is wrong with them overall. Tristana was clearly worse than jinx for all of 8.11 & 8.12 but got less of a buff than jinx, why? The kits of the champions were never the issue, so buffing them does not really make sense when riot changed the items so much and made them imbalanced.
The main item problem is the
change. It reduced crit marksman damage by roughly ~15% overall. At 11000 gold (used because you need that to get roughly the same base stats) in 8.10 with IE, Boots, Shiv, LW, RFC you did ~412.5 damage with a crit (using 70 base AD and no armor calculations after) and on the current patch at 11100 gold with IE, Zeal, Runnans, Boots, vamp scepter, and LW you do about ~340 with a crit with is 18% less damage compared to before.
Its such a drastic swing in power it should of been taken in smaller steps especially mid season when teams are preparing for worlds. The damage reduction alone in IE could of been enough to bring them in line without anything else being done. If that wasn't enough the zeal item cost should of been changed. Still not enough then hit the base stats. As you know they did all at once and threw out the class, which is why people are so upset. Why bruisers/mages are so common is they have kits designed to kill marksman or squishy champs. Its not like we can take these champs to another role like everyone who has come into bot lane recently.
you have some very obscure views about the role of marksman (not only this post but your presence on the boards)
i see, an ad hominem argument while literally only playing a single markman will give you more knowledge about the marskman role
quinn, corki and graves are not marksman anymore and haven't been for at least 1.5 seasons now.
Corki is not played bot lane, he's still played as a marksman before the crit nerfs he was literally putting 1k magic damage crit in each game with IE and sheen damage converted into magic damage
Quinn is compared as an assassin, yet builds crit on opgg scales well with crit as it synergise with passive and her base stats with kit allows her to DPS more than any assassin also from range
Graves I don't really care i will give you the point
what a lot of people are afraid of is marksman getting the left in the gutter for an extended period of time like bruisers did when runes reforged came out.
Bruisers were totally overshadowed by tanks in high elo+pro ornn cho sion were literally dominating with gnar basically being a tank too and also a "don't pick bruisers because i exist" pick
do you see that right now? i see marksmen in half of pro games or more
not only that, but opgg states that the majority of them are in top tier bot lane in regular play
tell me how the fuck are they in the gutter
The main item problem is the
change. It reduced crit marksman damage by roughly ~15% overall.
it's not a problem it was a solution that did well to the game
nice cherry pick of topics, i'm done after this post since you just want to fit your narrative and don't take all facts into account.
bruisers were out shined because they didn't have a keystone, what did you expect them to do? they didn't fit in the game, kinda like crit marksman now.
IE change was bad combined with all the other changes because you took all this power away and gave them nothing to crit marksman compensate. You made the build more expensive by ~800 gold, do ~15% less damage and then hit base stats on squishy champs who blow up anyway, then nerf shielding to protect them in 8.12. How are champs like Cait, tristana, Ashe, etc. supposed to get to late game?
You can do the same thing to any other role and people will be upset when you can't champs anywhere in the game.
ill just repeat this cause you ignored it: Its such a drastic swing in power it should of been taken in smaller steps especially mid season when teams are preparing for worlds. The damage reduction alone in IE could of been enough to bring them in line without anything else being done. If that wasn't enough the zeal item cost should of been changed. Still not enough then hit the base stats. As you know they did all at once and threw out the class, which is why people are so upset. Why bruisers/mages are so common is they have kits designed to kill marksman or squishy champs. Its not like we can take these champs to another role like everyone who has come into bot lane recently.
Did crit ADC need nerfs? Yes Did riot go about it the wrong way? Yes, too much taken away and minimal given back now the champs cant be played anywhere
i was a top main, then riot fucked us up and nobody listened, now bot gets some diversity we have been feeded for so long and the boards goes mad, dont you understand that the highest winrate botlaners are refugees of other lanes?? would you sent them back home and die?
You were a top main and you weren't fucked up and Riot did listen; that's why Conqueror exists as one of the single best keystones in the game.
As for the highest winrate botlaners being refugees of other lanes, that's also BS. Kennen goes top lane and has a 50% winrate there. Quinn goes top and mid and has a 54% winrate top and admittedly a low winrate mid at 47% but she still has the option of top lane and probably could still jungle. Wukong can go top, jungle, and I have seen him mid where he did pretty damn well as full damage; in top he has 58% WR and in Jungle he has a 49%. Veigar can play mid and support; he has a 48% winrate mid and a 44% as a support and is the first one that I would consider a "refugee thus far. Swain can go top and mid and has a 49.5% wr in both lanes. Xerath is going mid and support and has a dead 50% win rate in both.
So out of the six none ADCs, only one is actually not functioning in their preferred roles. All of the others are doing insanely better botlane while actually being balanced(or insanely better in the case of Wukong) in their preferred roles. There are not refugees. There are only opportunistic invaders who are using marksmen as easy, weak sacks of gold.
i think that bruisers and mage going bot are part and parcel of living in a balanced game
And that's why Kennen has a 57% wr, Wukong a 55%, Veigar a 54%, and Swain and Xerath a 53%. Because balance, right?
If they'd actually address these champions in botlane and balance them so they aren't completely over bearing and oppressive, sure, the variety is nice, its a nice option for the people who get Autofilled bot lane and don't know ADCs. But these picks having outlandish winrates over the native residents of botlane is ridiculous.
[{quoted}](name=FF HopSin,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=L6EyAf5t,comment-id=000200000000000100000000,timestamp=2018-07-01T11:22:41.297+0000)
i think that bruisers and mage going bot are part and parcel of living in a balanced game
if that was true then all adcs would be going top and mid while still being viable. that would be a truly balanced game. imagine being able to laneswap on a whim if you didnt like facing a certain champ and there being no negative consequences.
all those picks have between 0 and 1% pick rate, something that Mordekaiser bot lane always had and was always considered shit despite having 60% win rate wanna know why? something called low sample something that everyone on the boards knew (or i thought) Which is why OPGG takes high pick rate champions into top tier along with KDA win rate and overall pressure like CS rate
the only exeption in your list is Quinn who's gamebreaking
but she IS a marksman do you want me to list you her kit or you're willing to look at all the steroids that she gets? Just because she has burst doesn't mean she's an assassin or we should count jhin draven and mf as assassins too But assassins don't get to DPS in teamfight Quinn has a passive adding bonus damage to her AA, cooldown reduced by crit chance (in case you didn't know) W gives 80% bonus attack speed literally has 525 range and 0.668+3.1% as/lvl, you think assassins have this?
be real my friend
Twisted Fate has a passive that gives bonus damage to his AA, has 525 range, and his E gives bonus attack speed. He must be an ADC, too.
Okay but Quinn IS a ranged AD carry (albeit not a "traditional" one). She's got the same range as Kalista, Kai'Sa, and Xayah. She scales off crit chance via her passive. She has attack speed built-in on her W. And while most players build her with a focus on lethality and burst (similar to MF and Jhin at times), she can also build crit to great success (especially before the crit nerfs and when played in the bot lane). And if we're going to allow inferences about what is "intended", then her Patch 7.6 changes nerfed her burst and buffed her sustained damage, so her ADC playstyle seems to still be pretty intentional.
And what position she gets played in is irrelevant. ADC is not a lane, it's a class.
Not sure i want to call AD casters like MF, Lucian and Ezreal as marksmen, they play very, very differently from traditional marksmen like Cait, Ashe, kog and Varus.
Spam abilities, chunk opposition for massive damage from a distance or jump into their faces and chunk them.
To a degree Draven is like that as well and Jhin is entirely unique, kai sa is building straight AP and also plays around abilities to negate weakness(early&assassins/divers) and maximize strength.
Twitch is a abomination and him rising up is never a good thing for anyone or anything except himself, he is a massive timebomb that kills diversity all around the moment he starts working well.
Jinx and Ashe both have low-ish pickrates but their mains are at least doing somewhat well.'
However as i it see it...... my main ADC is ashe, my second would either be Trist or cait.
And this meta is definitely shit, even a slightly misstep results in you exploding and you have to invest twice or thrice the effort for the same reward as say Lucian or Kai sa could get.
Being somewhat weak early, lacking mobility and burst are all counted as fatal weaknesses of this meta, DPS has gone out the window largely and whats more the top DPS belongs to AP builds?
Having more range doesnt help at all when the short range oppositions deals tons more damage, scales way better, survives being dived far easier and also gets lane dominance easily or at least survives lane with little issue.
Feels real bad.
True, but there are some Marksman who downright are utterly quite useless but Riot refuses to buff them minorily and instead buff the Marksman that don't need buffs (Twitch and etc...).
Varus (my main champ) has a 42.34% winrate currently.
i agree but to add to your list Cait and tristana are borderline unplayable right now which is not good since they are super weak also, but cait has been commented as not getting any buffs by riot
that's because Cait is the gate keeper of bot lane, so they don't want diversity to be reduced by a single pick
she's not getting a buff until they massively work on her
which will take I don't know how much times, since they're reworking ezreal and then kalista will need work too to be balanced across all elos
Ezreal isnt being reworked.
After Akali, these are the priority champions:
With Nunu very heavily teased as being directly after her.
the one you're talking about are vgus ezreal is getting a mini rework on rengar revert lvl , or leblanc revert lvl
...
Context indicates theyre updating his model and maybe VO.
Its seeming like an elementalist Lux update, not a GU.
It wasn´t heavily teased.
That wasnt updated till later, but the teaser (a yeti and a child fistbumping) was fairly obvious.
Thats like every class tho, with 140+ champs theres gonna be weak champs of all classes.
There's a difference between a weak champ and a champion that needs buffs. Weak means that they aren't doing great: playable, but have a lower win rate, needing a lot of set up. A 42% winrate means you're literally a detriment to your team because of the champion you're picking.
Well last time I checked (right now lel) Varus had an almost 47% win rate. Not high either but ay
That statistic is just incorrect. His WR is around 43% right now. I don't know what to tell you if your actually think his WR is that high.
ap varus is still rocking 55%~ win ratio though.
play rate?
Oh, that makes me happy. Before he was meta in Season 7 as an ADC, I would play him AP midlane in season 6 and have a lot of success with that. c: Maybe I'll try that; it was one of the few off meta builds that one of my friends wouldn't get whiny about because I'd actually win lane 9 times out 10, lol.
?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿? NO, Varus is fking dead and he's the worst adc in the game on 8.13 what are you smoking wtf.
im smoking facts and statistics, might want to give that a try as it really gets you high on the ladder :^)
https://lolalytics.com/ranked/worldwide/current/platinum/plus/champion/Varus/ADC/
Where's the 55% winrate, show me that
Glad to see vlad isn't on there anymore at least
Swain however is insane, i tried him yetserday for the first time and dumpstered a kaisa