Lulu is at 50% winrate and is permabanned. Meanwhile Sona is at 57% winrate with a 0.8% banrate.

DoctorFunguy·May 17, 2017·5 votes·691 views

:thinking:

14 Comments

RedCycloneMay 17, 20176 votes

*53%

move along

Craft ZeppelinMay 17, 20172 votes

its quite strange how people do NOT think sona is strong. idk why

archerno1May 17, 20172 votes

[{quoted}](name=Craft Zeppelin,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=K4b0dVRN,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2017-05-17T09:22:10.073+0000)

its quite strange how people do NOT think sona is strong. idk why

She is too squishy. She usually starts Q and if enemy team gets lvl 2 first she is losing flash or dying for sure. Lulu starts with 525 hp while sona has 480.

Craft ZeppelinMay 17, 20171 votes

{quoted}

She is too squishy. She usually starts Q and if enemy team gets lvl 2 first she is losing flash or dying for sure. Lulu starts with 525 hp while sona has 480.

well...the problem is I dont see much situations her not getting level 2 1st.

Starcraft243verMay 17, 20171 votes

You have to compare pickrate and elo as well.

DoctorFunguyMay 17, 20171 votes

{quoted}

You have to compare pickrate and elo as well.

Its at diamond elo for both of them and they have literally the same exact pickrate at 2.9%

Starcraft243verMay 17, 20171 votes

http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/fr/champions/stats/sona/diamond

http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/fr/champions/stats/lulu/diamond

Funny i do not have the same numbers. If you took your numbers from championgg, they are flawed.

Hexs FortuneMay 17, 20171 votes

Honestly Lulu deserved nerfs and the current changes are a love tap.

Lulu is supposed to be squishy and the nerfs support that paradigm

KrigjerMay 17, 20171 votes

Probably because Sona's squishy and easy to pop with the way most people build her. It's not a challenge to remove her from the field.

Lulu has too many tools that make it difficult to catch her, let alone kill her.

AhristocatsMay 17, 20171 votes

Lulu had 53%+30% pick rate before she went permabanned (tons of ban=deflate win and pick rate)

Sona never had those stats, even when she was broken

and while i can't talk for low elo, Lulu is definitly more ban worthy in high elo than Sona whose laning phase revolves around cheesing an enemy that doesn't know sona's weaknesses while lulu has no weaknesses in lane