Seriously, can riot ever pronounce herself about more bans?

DropFill··8 votes·883 views

Seriously, 3 bans is mediocre right now

16 Comments

khorney3 votes

ikr people keep posting 5 bans per a team and each person gets 1 ban so 10 in total because ther is over 100 champs and 6 bans total is pretty low

Knight SoIaire 3 votes

i hate those threads mainly becuase the argument is sound and logical ... but the circumstances are fked up

ban in ranked game is basicaly an block for whatever riot fked up ... it is op you ban it ... it is toxic you ban it

the fact is that we shouldnt get banns ... champions should be made so we dont need them

yet riot is more focused on creating new skinns or the cleavage of a new champion to do something about this

Keon Kamori3 votes

The point of having bans is not to get rid of op or toxic champions, it is to remove the possibilities of the enemy team picking champions that will counter your teams composition. However with the inevitability of flavor of the month champions it is difficult for players to justify not banning these champs since the likelihood of playing against them is high.

Knight SoIaire 2 votes

also the champion pool is too big to simply do that ... one teamcomp can be countered by a realy big pool of chmpions just because there is so many

i get that this is what banns were meant to do but thats not what they actualy do on live even in lcs games it seems like they just ban whatever is strong and they dont want enemies to pick instead of what counters their teamcomp

SuperLuigiLXIV2 votes

At least a few people, myself included, have pointed out that Riot could run bans just like picks when in draft, so that five players get to ban one champ each over three rounds, therefore allowing more bans without increasing the time needed to go through bans. Alas, it is still not a thing, :C

Buttigieg 20201 votes

Riot, her? Wut..

DropFill1 votes

{quoted}

Riot, her? Wut..

her the company?

Tank071 votes

Well, in English everything that is not a person is always "It".

What is your native language? :D

DropFill1 votes

{quoted}

Well, in English everything that is not a person is always "It".

What is your native language? :D

Portuguese

BlackEyesBlue1 votes

Can yourself English seriously? :P

DropFill1 votes

{quoted}

Can yourself English seriously? :P

actually no

Slamurai Jack1 votes

Who are you so intent on banning right now? The only champs atm in my mind that are worth banning are Ryze and Ezreal; everyone else is fair game.

DropFill1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Slamurai Jack,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=I5v8vZtq,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2015-07-05T23:50:04.597+0000)

Who are you so intent on banning right now? The only champs atm in my mind that are worth banning are Ryze and Ezreal; everyone else is fair game.

ryze ez vayne kalista gragas vlad cho irelia

JChaosMaster1 votes

I think leaving the bans is fine because that's still 6. If they added then it would just make it easier to the OP to stay OP. Like ryze for example. If he was banded every game just because then no one would have seen JUst what he can do. With 6 you can avoid the newest/most OP people letting the old OP people in

Sona Ping1 votes

Because the purpose of bans isn't to remove all the champions a player still hasn't figured out how to lane against.

Llanite1 votes

It's a no. Otherwise they would have done so already.

Stop spamming.

More from Gameplay

More by DropFill