Why does Cassiopeia has built in mana sustain after all?
Never made any sense to me. The only champion who got that was Gragas and we know what happened to him
Never made any sense to me. The only champion who got that was Gragas and we know what happened to him

all of these champions have a Mana Sustain in some form passive or active. and I'm probably forgetting a few.
And Lissandra doesn't have sustain, but her passive is close enough

I think that's all of them, between the two of us.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think that's all of them, between the two of us.
Malzahar needs to kill at least 6 minions to sustain the mana he used. Veigar is passive mana regen. Swain mana is VERY mana hungry. Nunu? Xerath passive is twelve seconds. Cho'Gath is problematic as a midlaner nowadays. Annie gets a refund, it is not mana sustain. Jayce?
Also, I am talking about she being able to sustain mana as much as she wants, using her E to kill minions.
Why does Cassiopeia has built in mana sustain after all? The only champion who got that was Gragas and we know what happened to him
You said that the only champion with in-built mana sustain before Cassiopeia was Gragas, which is false.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
all of these champions have a Mana Sustain in some form passive or active. and I'm probably forgetting a few.
TF mana sustain is pretty bad. Karthus needs it because he actually uses a lot of mana. Kassadin damage is horrible compared to cassio
They still have mana sustain, which you claimed only Cassiopeia and pre-rework Gragas had.
TF mana sustain is pretty bad. Karthus needs it because he actually uses a lot of mana. Kassadin damage is horrible compared to cassio
Cassiopeia needs the sustain because she uses A LOT of mana! Rank 5 E is 90 mana, that's technically spamming an ult every 0.5 seconds. If you have troubles dealing with Cassiopeia, just freaking ask for advice, because there is counterplay you can make to her, I'm tired of this freaking whinning people, she already has been nerfed like 4 times this season.
Because she needs it to deal sustained dmg.

Cass has a play style like an adc so it's only fair to get mana refund and sustain when that kills something
[{quoted}](name=xJLx MCHammer,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=GskEzAbP,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2015-05-31T18:02:21.081+0000)
Cass has a play style like an adc so it's only fair to get mana refund and sustain when that kills something
what?
The only champion who got [mana sustain] was Gragas and we know what happened to him
There are like 30 champions that have built-in mana sustain. It's like an AA steroid.
Also - there are ~20 champions in the game that don't even use mana, along with the alternate forms of Nidalee and Elise.
Not sure I'd take issue with Cassi's mana sustain being there.
If you could write a solid explination of why mana sustain in Cassi's kit breaks certain paradigms that damage game health by falling into an anti-pattern and removing counter-play you might have something, but with champions like
existing, good luck with that.
On that note - the general pattern I've found for manaless champions is that they're much more in the sustained-damage direction than burst-cast. Being able to front-load 10 seconds of damage into 1 second is the main thing that costs mana, not overall damage potential. At least compared to other members of the same class. Riven can deal a ton of damage - but it's in a pretty extensive, drawn-out combo involving something like REWQQQR, preferably with a few AAs thrown in to make use of her passive. Compare that to Fiora's QQR combo that does cost mana, and limiting the time-frame you need to cast things and reaction time for your opponents costs considerably more mana.
If you look at Cassi - she's more in the sustained damage department compared to your typical QWER wombo-combo mage, so having somewhat cheaper skills makes more sense in the existing mana cost pattern.