I am so sick of the premade mission complainers.

Skorch··2 votes·282 views

Look I get it. You are solo. You dont wanna play with or find other people. And you think its unfair to HAVE to group up with people in order "To get the same stuff" I have even been seeing people say "required"

First off no missions are required, it is 100% added content.

Another thing you can get 100% of the exclusive rewards as a Solo player.

Do you guys look at tokens? Every non-premade mission 10 tokens, 1 premade mission a week 5 tokens.

Solo players get 100% of the exclusive rewards. Premades "Who can 'troll' in games without ruining the game for everyone. as well as cause less lobby disputes" get 110% of rewards.

What on earth is so chaoticly evil about this?

Riot is openly showing A) Its a team game where your goal is to have fun with friends B) They are creating nicher more fun missions without harming people who dont want to do them

Like people are so damn greedy about extra gear "oh man i dont get that extra key fragment cause i wasnt in a premade FUCK YOU RIOT"

For the love of god get that rod out of your ass and chill out a minute.

I understand this post was probably the most crude i have made, but good lord people are being entitled little shits.

15 Comments

PrismalDawn1 votes

I understand this post was probably the most crude i have made, but good lord people are being entitled little shits.

It goes both ways

MysterQ1 votes

You would be right, except you are wrong.

If the missions was OR, with two separate options, then sure. But as it is, you are required to have a 5man.

Skorch1 votes

But if it was OR then it would be just another normal "Do this thing everyone does" In which case why would you go for the off-meta 5man mission at all?

MysterQ1 votes

Maybe the 5guys who like playing together will do that. Maybe if it is slightly faster, people will try that over the longer OR mission.

Xion The XIV1 votes

I'm sorry but the problem with the premade missions is how stupid they are. First was a Melee only champions. That was disgusting. Second is all have TP. The Top laner can get away with this, the Mid laner can get away with this. But TP JG/TP ADC/TP support will be PUNISHED heavily for it. The problem is that one team can be playing for the mission while another team can be playing for the win.

MysterQ1 votes

no no no. Riot says you have to win to get credit :) such sucky bs. I don't want that extra (even if tiny) burden of having to win a stupid game.

Skorch2 votes

But the thing is Riot assumes if you are playing with friends it lessens the burden of losing (Albiet not too true since if your 5 man has been trying to win for the last 5 games with the mission you will be getting pretty salty but i digress)

I think Riot WANTS to do dumb, fucked comp missions. However they shouldnt make it "WIN" games with these fucked comps.

But Riot just wants to do dumb missions, and the only way to do that is with friends so that you dont have arguing in champ select. And I see no problem with that, it just is currently flawed.

I will state though that while i do see posts talking about that, I see far more just complaining that premade missions exist in the first place. Which i what this post is directed toward.

Xion The XIV1 votes

But then Riot Helps to ban people who try random shit and use the excuse of "Trolling". Not even talking about that random SInged support smite. There have been other things that have been banned. They are even nerfing champs out of their secondary Roles to the point it's this lane or no lane.

Skorch2 votes

Banning people largely depends on said "Trolls" attitude.

To my knowledge a lot of the people who did these things typically are kind of dicks about their legitimate strats.

And that is why this mission is a premade. Because you arent hurting your teammates by doing these. since you already planned on doing it from the start then.

Also on the nerfing champs in their secondary role, I somwhat disagree because Ezreal Lucian wouldnt be JG Mid, and before people start the ADC favoritism. Ziggs was pushed out of botlane from a meta swap NOT nerfs, Malzahar was nerfed because he was INSANELY overbearing in support. Brand wouldnt be buffed/nerfed with support in mind. Morgana Mid is being looked at again. And a lot of assassins are getting secondary ability to JG.

A lot of people claim nerfs to off comps are Riot enforcing Meta, but ignore the fact that the champ is there because their strong enough to be played there. Ziggs at the time of being botlane had been at 53% winrate for 4 months before he got a nerf that affected both mid and bot

Xion The XIV1 votes

But then what about Nautilus JG? His Shield was strong in the JG but apparently too strong in Top so they effectively wanted to ruin his Top lane, but in turn destroyed his JG. Alistar JG was a popular thing to do once, but now it's almost impossible to do well with it. Ekko JG was decent, but because Tank Top Ekko was cancer they ruined both roles for him as well. I'm sure there are more examples but those 3 are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.

Skorch1 votes

The issue is those were OVERBEARING times. Naut JG was a monster. If he is sitting in a 55% winrate top, 53% winrate JG and 50% winrate support. Are you telling me he SHOULDNT be nerfed for fear of hurting his offlanes. They are off for a reason.

If he got nerfed by 5% then he was have a balanced 50% in top a 48% in JG which is worse but not terrible. and a 45% in support, in which case they would need to find a way to buff JUST his supportability. So maybe something on Q.

Sure I understand it sucks when your fun offrole gets nerfed. But in the examples you gave they were nerfed for being strong in their intended role. You cant expect them to leave something oppressive just because his offrole is balanced. That doesnt make any sense. They arent TARGETING their offroles in those examples.

MysterQ1 votes

Except... the Ekko was completely offrole. Sure it was oppressive to some, but it was offrole and Riot didn't like it for their assassin (who should also stay mid).

MysterQ1 votes

The mission could easily be

Win premade5man 1 PVP game with xxxx OR Play premade5man 5 PVP game with xxxx

Missions would be finitely better. I would still hate to lose 5 games, but at least you are slowly making progress, so no tilt.

ChiTenshi1 votes

These arguments are for those who purchased the Masters Pass:

1) The requirements for the some of the premade missions are ridiculous. It's hard enough preparing a premade team but to make missions that require several attempts and a high skill level is ludicrous. Most people don't have the time to play 24/7, and most premade teams have drastically varied skill levels which result in you abandoning low-level friends to get the rewards (sorry Silver buddy, but Riot demands I play with a good team to get these rewards).

2) I am penalized 25% of the bonus tokens from the Masters Pass for not having a premade team. If I buy extra content to a game, I expect to have full access to that content and the potential rewards.

Skorch2 votes

I agree with your arguments.

The premade missions are pretty hard, because their offmeta, but i see it as riot wanting the games to be off, and if you lose at least you werent forcing other people into doing what you wanted.

The missions themselves DEFINETLY NEED WORK HOWEVER. I am not denying that.

As well as I agree the masters pass missions being premade is pretty bullshit since you DID pay for it.

But also understand that my main irk when it comes to these people are the ones complaining that premade missions exist at all for slightly extra content. When they are completely okay in the game for TINY extra rewards. If you pay for it 100% call riot out. But the amount of flak premades get for existing pisses me off to no extent.

That is the point i was trying to make.

More from Gameplay

More by Skorch