gnar nerf is pretty unnecessary.
gnar is picked 9% of the time in ranked, has a 50% winrate, and people still qq like mad for nerfs on him. meanwhile rammus has almost the same pick rate, has a a 54% winrate in ranked, and is pretty much an all-around terror in most elos. why doesn't he get a nerf? in fact, gnar isn't even in the top 10 for highest winrates, and not even close, might i add. so why nerf him? to make the babbies in top lane stop qqing about him instead of just, idk COUNTERPICKING/COUNTERBUILDING HIM? how about amumu, who maintains a 55% winrate and 11% pick rate in ALL modes of ranked? why does riot nerf people who are in a good place, while leaving others bullcrappingly strong who have high pick/win rates alone?