So this way, the power of banning champions doesn't stay, sometimes ,on hands of a douchebag. We also need more bans, and a ban for every single member of the team will reduce toxicity while changing how random is the position on draft mode.
ValyrianBlade1 votesIf they want to keep 3 bans, which honestly I think 3 is enough, I think it'd be cool if solo queue had the last 3 picks get 1 ban each instead of first pick getting all 3.
Mostly because first two picks both get their main role (if you only Main 1 role, please go to teambuilder). If I'm a late pick and tell you I want mid/jg/adc and the first 3 picks take those roles anyways so I'm stuck in an off-role, it would be nice if I could at least have banned a problem champion in that role or something. It's really sickening to see first pick take mid when 2 other people wanted it, to ban 3 mid laners, then still feed Lane hard. If you're first/second pick you really should never be feeding, you don't need to win Lane but at least be competent in the role...
Guess I sort of changed topic a bit, sorry.
QuantumLight1 votesOr flip it so that last pick does the banning.
honestly both sound nice, but if everyone bans once everyone gets to get rid of a champ they have issues with. i might have an odd issue with irelia top... one ban would fix that.
VertexRose1 votesHow exactly does it reduce toxicity? Usually people come with a mindset of screwing around in the game before the ban selection starts. This game was also created in the mind of 5v5 teams, so your captain can make the ban picks for your team.
DropFill1 votesHow exactly does it reduce toxicity? Usually people come with a mindset of screwing around in the game before the ban selection starts. This game was also created in the mind of 5v5 teams, so your captain can make the ban picks for your team.
Captain can screw 3 bans. One person can screw only one. Reduced toxicity already