Should I be using fervor or warlords on Tryndamere?

Pyrithegethon·Jun 17, 2017·1 votes·792 views

Or maybe a different keystone?

13 Comments

oSEXYPLATYPUSoJun 17, 20171 votes

hmm tryn auto attacks right?

fervor adds bonus damage on attacks? tryn likes to do damage

seems pretty simple

SlythionJun 17, 20172 votes

Trynd also is known for a rough <6 laning phase and has built-in crit for his kit

Rough laning phase + free crit, Trynd likes that Sustain

It comes down to preference really, but Warlords is definitely better when in a bad matchup

oSEXYPLATYPUSoJun 17, 20171 votes

does he not have his sustain on his ability to consume his fury to heal him ?

SlythionJun 17, 20173 votes

but he sacrifices the damage that trynd likes so much by consuming his fury, and it's almost always not enough against a bully lane

oSEXYPLATYPUSoJun 17, 20171 votes

and dont you take 5 points in the lifesteal mastery? and combine that with a dorans blade start

i think battle of fervor is way better then warlords

SlythionJun 18, 20171 votes

tbh, I don't actively play Tryndamere so I don't take either :^)

you could very well be right. Fervor is probably better in most situations, but I still think Warlords is the best one for rough matchups ie. Jayce, Teemo, Pantheon, etc

oSEXYPLATYPUSoJun 18, 20171 votes

based on champion.gg his most popular mastery is fervor with a win % of 54.60% with the most common master set up. however the highest win rate mastery setup still has fervor with a 69.23% win rate

on op.gg fervor is picked 74.42% of the time with a 51.79% win rate where as warlords has a 17.23% pick rate with a 52.58% win rate and then stromraiders surge has a 6.22% pick rate with a 52.86% win rate

so multiple data shows that fervor is just over all better for the champ

but i always welcome conversation over the game

SlythionJun 18, 20171 votes

True, you should watch what you're saucing in the future though. Personally, I don't trust champion.gg for much oustide of a general win-rate and pick-rate for the champion as a whole.

Besides that, it's important to note that the 69.23% win rate is out of a 26 game sample, that's not nearly enough to trust that statistic in the slightest :p

Although I agree, Fervor is generally better in most matchups but Warlords seems like an almost must-have in lanes where Tryndamere will be bullied out. Fervor is generally better while Warlords should probably be taken in rough matchups, but it really comes down to preference and play-style

oSEXYPLATYPUSoJun 18, 20171 votes

i just used the 69.23% win rate as an example of more then one data point and if you look at that set up the only mastery different between that set up and the most common one is the changing using perseverance to fearless in the resolve tree.. all 29 other masteries are the same ...

SlythionJun 18, 20171 votes

true, it makes me wonder who the 1-2 people are in plat+ elo that take that mastery setup. Why do they differ from the rest and how have they found so much success in the 15-30 games he/they had compared to the rest?

who knows

oSEXYPLATYPUSoJun 18, 20171 votes

well considering it gives your bonus armor/mr when u take damage makes him tanker in trades therefore harder to kill

StealWolverineJun 18, 20171 votes

It better allows you to cheese early as well, and snowball from there.

MarshbouyJun 17, 20171 votes

It's pretty much down to preference i think. they can/are both pretty good on him. I'd say that warlords would be better than FOB if you were in a poor matchup.