Riot where exactly is your logic at?

"With the introduction of dynamic queue, we alienated a portion of League's passionate player-base who believe a ranked competitive experience should be limited to a solo (or duo) endeavor. We agree dynamic queue standings don't reflect pure individual skill as well as a solo ladder, but they also don't inhibit competitive team experiences, and that's a trade-off we want to make."

They do in fact inhibit competitive team experiences cause you're putting 5 random strangers against 4 premades with a voice chat that offers far better communication than your pings and allow better plays in comparison to 5 strangers HOPING that the Jungler ganks, HOPING the support wards, HOPING the ADC doesn't go in the frontlines like an idiot, HOPING that top lane doesn't stay an island, and HOPING objectives are met.

Premades in ranked usually already have a plan and if they are friends they will likely be working together in better shape than 5 strangers who will likely end up flaming at each other.

Dynamic queue doesn't just reflect pure individual skill poorly, but also reflects competitive team experiences poorly.

If you were to put experienced members in a basketball team that know each other and have played each other for years versus random number of members who may or may not have experienced and not have a clue how each one plays, who do you honestly think has the better chance of winning? It's simple logic to see that this DOES inhibit competitive team experiences.

And quite frankly, I hate the idea of having to rely on chances of there being a premade on my team versus a premade on the other team to make it somewhat fair.

Obviously you're not gonna turn back on this decision, you're too stubborn and ignorant on your decisions. Your balance making decisions shows that and this decision shows that too.