Seeing people debate what "skill" on the forums is so funny.

Marshbouy··2 votes·247 views

Skill is so relative and dependent on the meta, buildpath, skill levels, etc. I'd argue that it takes way more skill to play Annie mid in challenger thanViktor.

PSA: Don't waste your time arguing about what does and doesn't take skill.

9 Comments

Warlord Scrap3 votes

your mistaking mechanical skill with overall skill. annie require less mechanical skill than viktor or lee. But your right annie in challenger would require more overall skill to win than viktor.

Marshbouy1 votes

I'm really not confusing the two. I'm talking about skill in general, since most posts just say "skill" then start blabbing about mechanical and overall skill interchangeably. But yes i guess you are right, I'm not good with semantics.

Warlord Scrap2 votes

because skill is commonly accepted term for difficulty. Diffuclty of a champ is how much mechanical skill the champion needs to be succesful. and your arguing semantics

ChargeItDownMid1 votes

[deleted]

Warlord Scrap1 votes

i meant te difficulty bar on the champ screen

Big Lincoln2 votes

everything i lose to is no-skill brain dead freelo

Titanium701 votes

I feel ya...

It wouln't be that bad if people would actually debate the different types of skill in objective maner... but always this 'I play a Champ with 'High Skillceiling'... I'm so pro' or 'My Champ is Hard to play he deserve to be stronger than everyone else"... ARGH!

Sadly... I'm guilty as well - I can't help my selfe and jump into the ring... sorry.... q.q

[zombie-nunu-tears]

More from Gameplay

More by Marshbouy