smart surrender prevention

Valhalla Rising··5 votes·821 views

some people have almost no determination, and want to quit for the most ridiculous reasons.

even I have started a rage vote just to end up regretting it because the rest of the team voted yes and I feel stupid for letting my emotions control me.

there is really no reason to surrender a 40-50 minute game period, especially if both sides are relatively even in gold and turrets.

so maybe there could be a system that would assess the current gold and objective differentials, as well as any players that might be disconnected and determines if a surrender vote should be allowed or not.

like if both teams are down to one nexus turret each and the gold totals are close, the system should definitely not allow a surrender vote at that point.

but if your team only has 1 turret left and the enemy has like 5 and they are like 15k gold ahead, the system would not stop a surrender vote.

as far as disconnected players go, a surrender vote for this should only be allowed if the player does not reconnect within 5 minutes.

/ff is op...

10 Comments

CleverExpletive2 votes

I'm way more likely to say yes to a surrender vote at 20 minutes than I am at 50 minutes. At that point I've already invested so much time into the game I might as well let it play out.

This is, of course barring trolls and such. But at that stage of the game both teams should be reaching full build, even if behind, and then it becomes a game of team fighting and baron control.

Ch0c0lateJesus2 votes

Some people have actual lives and dont want to spend 40+ minutes in a game with whiny kids and trolls. We dont need a system that locks us into toxic games.

blacknerdtaku1 votes

No. 1 reason

in the event that something comes up you cannot safely surrender the game. at the very least if something comes up id rather tell my team and have them be a little upset than get reported for something out of my control.

Valhalla Rising1 votes

{quoted}

No. 1 reason

in the event that something comes up you cannot safely surrender the game. at the very least if something comes up id rather tell my team and have them be a little upset than get reported for something out of my control.

you are saying 4v5's are impossible to win? if someone stops playing, they afk after like 2-3 min, thne the system prevents surrender for another 5 min, so they would only have to waita max of 8 min, which is no big deal, and that 8 min could end up to a 4v5 win because the underdogs were forced to try their best.

straight4free2 votes

{quoted}

you are saying 4v5's are impossible to win? if someone stops playing, they afk after like 2-3 min, thne the system prevents surrender for another 5 min, so they would only have to waita max of 8 min, which is no big deal, and that 8 min could end up to a 4v5 win because the underdogs were forced to try their best.

At any decent level of play, 4v5s are near impossible to win.

It Hertz When IP1 votes

I've won games like that, but it was mostly in ARAM with the enemy team having a horrible composition.

Valhalla Rising1 votes

{quoted}

At any decent level of play, 4v5s are near impossible to win.

according to you.

theragingnerd1 votes

when our jungler is shaco our top is lee and our adc is varus and we are up against ryze kass and sion i might want too surrender even when gold is even

McAllister1 votes

No, we should be able to leave as soon as 4/5 or 3/4 of us want to.

Valhalla Rising1 votes

{quoted}

No, we should be able to leave as soon as 4/5 or 3/4 of us want to.

dumb, i give up on this comminity.

sometimes ppl only dc for like 30 seconds, BUT OH LORD THATS GAME RIGHT THERE NEED FASTEST FORFEIT POSSIBLE RIGHT MEOW OR I DIE IRL ZZZZZZZZZZOMG.

More from Gameplay

More by Valhalla Rising