Resource-less Vs. Energy
I've always wondered this; Why have resource-less champions at all, when they tend to be overbearing even compared to Energy-using champions? At least the latter can be played around, since they're given a mechanic that penalizes them if they miss the energy regen ability. (except in Lee's case, where his is AA's.)
Every champion without a resource could easily be put on Energy.
Why is everyone responding as if I meant Yasuo? I meant.. everyone.
Fury is a resource, dude who said Tryn.
Edit, copied/pasted from my response to a comment: Some examples of resource-less champions and how they'd easily be set to Energy: Kat would be EXACTLY the same as Akali, where she regains energy if she AA's the person with the mark from her Q (Those are basically the same ability). So she could keep up the spam, just like Akali, if she took the time to auto.
Riven's passive could work VERY well with energy, since it buffs her autos, make it so she refunds the energy from abilities when she lands an AA with the passive.
Yasuo, Make his Q cost energy and refund the cost entirely if it hits an enemy. Then , if he misses during a fight, he's penalized for it.
could spam their abilities indefinitely then they would be overpowered. It gives them flexibility to spam their skills without having to worry about running out of mana and not being able to use them anymore but still inhibits their uses and forces them to play well around the costs.
because if they had an energy to manage at all they would be completely useless due to how much they need to spam their skills. In return they have certain weaknesses that make up for having no resource.
because they don't have a large enough of a weakness to make up for the fact that they have no resource to manage (or a resource that requires minimal management). There is no reason, for example, that