Riot's Orwellian doublespeak on Zed, and why LoL takes place in 1984.
In the recent interview posted about the new Duskblade item given by Axes, I read some things that made me feel bewildered and confused.
Let's start with the statement that AD assassins currently feel that they aren't being 'supported' with their item options. Zed currently has a respectable winrate of 52.75, Talon even higher at 53.53. Where did the conclusion come from that these champions are being 'supported'?
What does it mean for a player to feel that they are not being supported? How does playing Zed, and assassinating a squishy, feel different whether I do it with a youmuu's first or a duskblade?
Now this is where I feel that Axes has suddenly morphed into Big Brother. He then goes on to say "We understand that AD assassins offer low counterplay and significant frustration playing against."
Um. What? You're talking me in circles Riot. If these champions, that Meddler (I believe it was) stated not long ago were 'in a bad spot', shouldn't their winrates reflect that? Is a champion's winrate not a reflection of how well game itemization is 'supporting' them?
How do you justify making an item that turns your auto attacks into a zed-ult esque execute, a MASSIVE buff in terms of itemization, while simultaneously admitting these champions offer low counterplay and significant frustration to play against? The issue is clearly not in itemization, but inherent issues in the kits of these champions.
[zombie-brand-mindblown]