REMOVE CONQUEROR

Press Q Win·Jun 24, 2018·5 votes·2,266 views

Enought with true damage everywhere ! It break the game and this runes made champion even more cancerous to face ! Remove this runes !

7 Comments

DoktorKaiserJun 24, 20182 votes

Remove conqueror and replace it with old fervor, or just keep the name and change it completely. Also electrocute needs to be gutted at least 50% early game and buffed a bit late game as a compensation.

Press Q WinJun 24, 20182 votes

{quoted}

Remove conqueror and replace it with old fervor, or just keep the name and change it completely. Also electrocute needs to be gutted at least 50% early game and buffed a bit late game as a compensation.

Old fervor was perfect. We didn't need more true damage in this game.

OwnedByAGirlxxxJun 27, 20182 votes

just had a game with a normal stat yasuo dealing 1720 true damage in matter of 3-4 seconds to me.... i was darius with 3300hp .... whats wrong with this picture? i had 250+ armour and he killed me in a matter of a few seconds and half my hp was done by true damage, tanks and bruisers are just ruined by this key stone, time to build full ad from now on when i see yasuo or trynda. adc's dont take conq...

BrightWîngsJun 24, 20181 votes

I think it just needs too be nerfed without this tanks will be too strong again because there is nothing to deal with them right now with all the bruisers tanks just get melted and can barely live long enough to tank

NY64Jun 24, 20183 votes

If tanks were too strong, shouldn’t their items be nerfed instead of adding a keystone that is effective at blowing up everyone. I agree with the post, not only has the keystone dragged the game into a very unfair state where ad champions are extremely dominant in this meta. But the keystone has also ruined champion diversity and rune diversity. Before I remember bruiser players arguing which keystones were the best for them. Now it’s just why use any other keystone when you can use conqueror will always be the best choice.

Press Q WinJun 24, 20181 votes

{quoted}

If tanks were too strong, shouldn’t their items be nerfed instead of adding a keystone that is effective at blowing up everyone. I agree with the post, not only has the keystone dragged the game into a very unfair state where ad champions are extremely dominant in this meta. But the keystone has also ruined champion diversity and rune diversity. Before I remember bruiser players arguing which keystones were the best for them. Now it’s just why use any other keystone when you can use conqueror will always be the best choice.

This. Champion can be tuned down. The runes was too much, you legit can't itemize against champion there was some counterplay . Let's just proc conqueror and say '' fuck your armor /magic resist''

Kurt HyzanJun 24, 20181 votes

item 3071 item 3153 item 3036 item 3031

On-hits builds can melt tanks without caring about mr armor or hp : item 3091 item 3124 item 3153

You have champions designed to melt tanks : Vayne Fiora

Issue with tanks isn't related to tankiness (not talking about magic resist), it's just about them dealing too much damage while having good cc rotations. Rito shouldn't focus on ways for other classes to melt tanks, and should focus on nerfing tanks damage / cc.