The champion pool is getting bigger and bigger by every year
And its weird and odd how the 1st and 2nd pick are being left out not being able to ban in a "1 ban for each person" like wheres the fun in that?
And while all the site stats mostly have champs shown as the top 10 bans.
ModWulf Helhammer4 votesThe ability to easily ban a majority of a role entirely
The fact that it wouldn't really do anything in terms of balance. All it would do is move the forum posts to the next 10 champions.
Dankstin1 votesIt might put a damper on selections for that role, but the fact that options in every other role aren't restricted due to bans evens it out, definitely. If you get Fizz mid on your team cuz he wasn't banned for all the jungle bans and you can't win that game because someone couldn't click Yi, that's not the only problem you have.
MunchCrunchLunch1 votesdownvoted
ModWulf Helhammer3 votesAnd for what reason is that? Because you left an oh so eloquent response. Surely it will be remembered through the ages as a great literary masterpiece.
CppL2 votesCause of the lcs.they would ban all broken and op champs ,so no more flashy and fancy plays.
Popstar Ahri1 votesCause of the lcs.they would ban all broken and op champs ,so no more flashy and fancy plays.
....
that dosen't even make sense, since theres always the next tier champions that are going to be considered OP that are in the top 20 bans, that LCS players still have variety of champs to abuse anyway b
blfUvZ8Ybu1 votesI agree but champions banning time? Maybe very long.
Dankstin1 votesBan a champion on the same screen that you pick your dynamic 2 roles. It would literally champion select time in half, and everyone would be able to see who is banned when they pick who they want to play, putting the banned champion icon grayed out next to the summoner icon of the player who banned that champion.
Edit: In hindsight, nothing would stop the same players from having banned the same champion, but those who didn't should get a chance in champion select if that champion is already banned.
blfUvZ8Ybu1 votesIt isn't original idea.It may kill champion select screen excitement.
But I don't know.I haven't an idea.
Dankstin1 votes[{quoted}](name=Akatsuki Deidara,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wREU0AiE,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2016-05-20T00:11:48.298+0000)
It isn't original idea.It may kill champion select screen excitement.
But I don't know.I haven't an idea.
What I just posted is most definitely an idea that I came up with in my own imagination, therefore, it is an original idea - hence me being the origin.
Fusarix1 votesBan a champion on the same screen that you pick your dynamic 2 roles. It would literally champion select time in half, and everyone would be able to see who is banned when they pick who they want to play, putting the banned champion icon grayed out next to the summoner icon of the player who banned that champion.
Edit: In hindsight, nothing would stop the same players from having banned the same champion, but those who didn't should get a chance in champion select if that champion is already banned.
Then how would it decide who gets to ban a different champion?
PhDs Nuts1 votesMake it one ban per person, but cut the time you have to ban down by five seconds each. The lobby would only get a little longer, and that's only if everyone uses the full time to ban.
Gorgannan1 votesYou could ban Cait/MF/Varus/Graves/Twitch and likely ban out the ADC's the other team is comfortable with.
grug1 votesthe problem is that riot cannot allow it because of the concept of 'roles' and many players fail when it comes to versatility/adaptation in champion pools
the only real people who would benefit would be the off meta mains ie people that main yorick/urgot etc as I'd predict after the first 6 bans people would just ban the meta overplayed champs like lucian, ekko, zed or even luck based champions like blitz would causing them to have 100% ban rates.
of course they could just do a pick-ban-pick-ban system if they thought about it logically.
Dankstin1 votesIn the same order you get your pick, the person who is in that order would get to ban someone else if the system detected prequeue that the share a champion selection for who was banned. For example:
SUM1's ban was 
and they are 1st in line, but SUM3 also had banned.
SuM1 doesn't ban and SUM3 does get a ban opportunity because their selection is already set in stone, otherwise they'd be denied the option of a unique ban.
Calabok1 votesReduce banning to 3 choices. Make it more challenging [slayer-jinx-wink]