Could we get some more distinction please?

So I've seen some posts and I'm curious. Why are mages and supports easily exchangeable? I mean the tank support ( ) can only really go bottom (with a few exceptions of course.) But then we have AP/Damage/poke things supports who can easily go mid. and sometimes . As of late though I have seen plenty of mages simply going bottom to effectively be assholes, champions like the list goes on.

I'm asking that we establish what sort of champions are actually made for certain roles. (Looking at you eve.) Ah Evelyn, such a great example of a champion with a single role. She does jungle pretty well and has no use elsewhere. Why can't we apply this to supports? I want to know why riot won't turn down mage supports damage, or turn the mid mages utility down to discourage them from playing mid. Because if they're going mid or support permanently one of these is gonna have to happen.

So if we say.... put in the form of support. They'll get overall better base damages more hp and some minor armor/mr buffs, but inversely we'll see there scaling almost disappear.

The reason I'm bringing this up is because supports should never be deemed "good" because they can 100-0 the enemy ADC 1v1. I think mage/utility supports really need to make them lockdown plays and ASSIST their marksman by supplementing damage.

(I'm also tossing around ideas for making it impossible to buy both lich bane and frost queens.)

Alright, I've just made every lux player in existence infuriated, k I get it. We can keep her mid..... for now....

But hey I'm just speaking my mind, and you can too. / / / / / Let's see just how toxic y'all get eh?

                                                                                                                                                                                                        ~~~~heheheheh