Whoever picks last gets to counter everybody else in the game. The guy that picks first really has no say in who he doesn't want to counter him. I would feel that the top three picks would benefit more from bans, especially if you are going top melee and you can at least get rid of teemo, quinn or graves. Since the new draft started, picking first or second sucks compared to being one of the last picks.
Afk Teemo Ward1 votesWhoever picks last gets to counter everybody else in the game. The guy that picks first really has no say in who he doesn't want to counter him. I would feel that the top three picks would benefit more from bans, especially if you are going top melee and you can at least get rid of teemo, quinn or graves. Since the new draft started, picking first or second sucks compared to being one of the last picks.
In a way I agree with this, in a way I don't, largely because I personally feel there needs to be more bans in general. When they increased the bans to six, there were 87 ish champs in the game, meaning you could ban 7% of the champs in game. Now there are so many champs that you can only ban 4%ish.
I strongly feel if they touch the banning system, they should increase the bans to one each, and then add a phase where each team can unban one champ, that way people can't get banned out of roles, but its no longer a game of whackamole where you can't ban all of the people that rito has buffed to nonsense and back lately.
