New fervor vs. old

Tundra Hunter··3 votes·596 views

I think Fervor of battle was much healthier being on-hit damage rather that giving AD stats.

Being on-hit was great for on-hit champions, tank, fighter, marksman, some mages -any class really! And also for auto-attack champions (who don't necessary rely on AD). It was a great mastery, it was situational for many champ/playstyle... it was also very healthy!

Currently, in my opinion fervor is broken, it is very niche, and for many champions who where reliant on the old on-hit fervor, there is currently no good keystone mastery.

p.s. Sorry I posted this on Story, Art, & Sound before, my bad.

2 Comments

Ben Sharpio2 votes

Yeah i agree. I think old ferver kinda appealed to more champion, whereas the new one is only viable for a few. I kinda miss being able to make use of sion's passive with it.

khorney2 votes

i ve posted this becuase varus ht eonly adc i like to play was way better with the onhit then the extra ad.... not to mention you could gain stacks with spells...... now you cant

More from Gameplay

More by Tundra Hunter