As they are more likely to get counter picked, whenever I'm first pick I have to beg someone on my team to ban insert champion here because they counter me. Where as when I'm last pick I'm just like, "well 
annoying I guess I'll just ban her".
This is just my opinion I could be completely wrong.
Inquisitor Kane3 votesNo. It would be unfair advantage because you would be able not only to ban, but also to pick first form all the champions that are left.
The way it is now is kinda all right because you either ban or pick first.
That ofc would change if we get 10 bans.
YoungFarmer2 votes[{quoted}](name=Inquisitor Kane,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=sMLrnjsF,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-12-16T04:36:56.606+0000)
No. It would be unfair advantage because you would be able not only to ban, but also to pick first form all the champions that are left.
The way it is now is kinda all right because you either ban or pick first.
That ofc would change if we get 10 bans.
I fucking hate being first pick, as I rarely ever play champions that are first pick worthy. 10 bans would be incredibly fair tbh. I would love it.
Limmie1 votesFirst pick is pretty bad yo.
Inquisitor Kane1 votesI also hate it but you have the best opportunity to pick something because you have 129 champions free to chose from. That's where the strategy of first pick comes into play. Sure, there is nothing like it in soloQ but in LCS it is a powerful tool
ChaddyFantome1 votesNo, because the first two already get the benefit of securing picks that the last 3 dont get.