karthus has a 33% win rate in diamond, swain 41%
revert the nerf and buff them, they are completely useless right now
revert the nerf and buff them, they are completely useless right now
Hey look at that. Urgot is above half the people there and above Lee Sin. http://i891.photobucket.com/albums/ac117/dont_panic4242/GIFs/000865r2.gif
We know those three Diamond Urgot players know what they're doing then.
Did you forget about Urgot being picked a bunch during the tank meta? He's one of the biggest lane bullies in the game, in addition to being ranged, and he's really hard to all-in due to his shield and the damage reduction buff on his ult which was added during preseason. He also has one of the strongest mid games ever, and games right now are faster, so they usually end around the mid game. I'm personally not surprised.
No, I just forgot about him being a playable champ.
I think most of the Lee Sins that lost were crybabies that didn't get what they wanted, so they AFK'd and lost their team the game.
Eh? Your link shows a 44% winrate for Karthus and a 51% winrate for Swain..
And Tristana has a 46% winrate - stop using this page. I guess they use the data of the latest 24 hours or something and only of one region so that their samplesize is so low that you can't rely on the data. Use champion.gg instead, it uses plat+ only statistics and is way more reliable.
Well this site does not look totally wrong, but as like every other statistical tool it does not "solve arguments" by itself but is just a mere tool to understand data.
... and i am not really sure how much it is wise to use this site at all for any kind of judgement. It shows winrates for each region and for each division as a way to determine what to ban ( which honestly is not the best way to ban things at all, if not for people that do not know how to think in ban phase) , and when judging scenarios like Diamond only on a server then you incur on a lot of small population problems. Still, looks like a nice gatherer of data, but i am not sure how much is actually usable.
Champion.gg, on the other hand, offers a choice more oriented for general cases since it studies a population that is big enough, but where baseline skill is similar ( but not too much, so it keeps a bit of realism to compare for all other elos ) and is more reliable to gauge the impact of a champion for general uses. Again it does not solve arguments by itself, even if many people make it appear so...
Champion.gg, on the other hand, offers a choice more oriented for general cases since it studies a population that is big enough, but where baseline skill is similar ( but not too much, so it keeps a bit of realism to compare for all other elos ) and is more reliable to gauge the impact of a champion for general uses. Again it does not solve arguments by itself, even if many people make it appear so...
Agreed, data is incredibly useful, however it's dangerous as there are always some factors that are not included (eg the amount of normals that people have on that champion even though they only have 1-5 rankeds) and other irregularities that might lead one to wrong conclusions.
And Tahm has 45% win rate Yasuo has 42% Vayne also only has 47%
useless
actually all i see those champions do is lose yasuo does poorly more often than not most vaynes just get wrecked in lane
Then you look at their pick and ban rates.
Edit: wtf, Heimerdinger at 34% win-rate? Bullshit.
Heimer is at 44%
Meh vayne kinda fell out of meta this season due to other adcs stomping
This only shows how different pools showcase different statistical results, and how those needs to be takes with a grain of salt ( while it seems here there is too much salt already).
And in this case the player pool is so small that it can skew results by a lot, since diamonds are a really really low % of players which brings up a lot of issues about statistical research.
Please find better excuses that bringing up these results as truth.
If so, then why is Riot already balancing things for diamond+?
Because LCS teams are not populated by Silvers.
That's some stupid argument, really.
Never said I agreed with it.
Holy shit MIss Fortune is broken. Not even satire. Jesus christ that pickrate/winrate.
But if this site was reliable we'd have to buff yasuo too. And I don't want my favorite champ permabanned.
Yasuo deserves buffs, he is too weak right now.
If you are talking about having relatively lower base damage than other Fighter or Assassins, you MAY have a point. But having 100% crit in two items and a wall that shits on nearly every skill shot? Yeah, no...
Except that means nothing when he builds full AD and gets one shot if he goes anywhere near anyone in a teamfight. Yasuo was always weak until warloads. Then after they buffed warloads people, I am sheep of this community, complained still and they nerfed his items as well. Now he's trash tier 45% win rate champ. GJ bronzies
If he goes full AD he should be 1 shotting anything
False, play him and realize that this is wrong, or stay bad
You just said they buffed him after warlord so doesn't that mean he isn't weak now?
They never buffed him. Warloads was nerfed to the ground
Yasuo has no personal items. They may have nerfed items he uses but that affects everyone that uses them not just him.
But Yasuo uses them the most and those where his core items. No one used SHiv as core as Yasuo did
The winrate doesn't even define the champ because it's mainly dependent on the player and how they use the champion
If you did your research you would realize that people with 125+ games on him (experienced players) on average only maintain a 49% win rate. Big problem here
[{quoted}](name=Savage Bear,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=qw4sMvht,comment-id=000200000001000000000000,timestamp=2016-01-03T23:45:01.567+0000)
False, play him and realize that this is wrong, or stay bad
I don't understand. Are you trying to say I'm bad because I don't play Yasuo? If so that's horrible reason. Not saying I'm good at this game but, that makes no sense at all. Also let me ask you, does an actually smart Yasuo go for full AD? If not the scenario where going full AD seems kind of invalid of only a fool would do so. On top of that the way you build affects how you get through the game greatly. My point is you are using hypothetical scenario that may not even happen that often or SHOULDN'T happen if the Yasuo knows what he is really doing.
They never buffed him. Warloads was nerfed to the ground
"Then after they buffed warloads people" <what's this statement mean then?
But Yasuo uses them the most and those where his core items. No one used SHiv as core as Yasuo did
All these I have seen use Shiv. Yasuo is not the only person who uses Shiv. He is not the only one who benefits from Shiv. The only thing that makes Shiv better on Yasuo is the crit passive. Nerfing Shiv is not a direct Nerf to yasuo because It does not only affect him.
If you did your research you would realize that people with 125+ games on him (experienced players) on average only maintain a 49% win rate. Big problem here
OK so a 49% winrate is bad? If anything this tells me, Yasuo needs no buffing at all and He should be fine where he stands unless he is literally only losing through being hard countered.
I don't understand. Are you trying to say I'm bad because I don't play Yasuo?
No, I'm calling you bad because you're trying to discuss a champ that you have no idea how he works and have never played him. All you're doing is pulling BS out of your ass
"Then after they buffed warloads people" <what's this statement mean then?
Warloads was broken, so he was strong. Then they nerfed it to the ground along with his items and he became trash tier
All these I have seen use Shiv. Yasuo is not the only person who uses Shiv. He is not the only one who benefits from Shiv. The only thing that makes Shiv better on Yasuo is the crit passive. Nerfing Shiv is not a direct Nerf to yasuo because It does not only affect him.
Xin never rushed shiv nor does he even buy it. Shiv is the worst item on Riven LOL this proves you don't know what you're talking about. None of those champs had shiv as strong core item must rush as Yasuo except maybe trynd. Please stop
OK so a 49% winrate is bad? If anything this tells me, Yasuo needs no buffing at all and He should be fine where he stands unless he is literally only losing through being hard countered.
49% win rate on the experienced players IS BAD. If you're putting in a lot of time to learn him and still can't maintain a good win rate then there's a problem. Look at the win rates of other champs with experienced players. I'll use Anivia for example. Her avg total win rate is 50%, but experienced players avg a 57% win rate.
Yasuo has a avg total of 45% and experienced players avg a 49% win rate. REALLY BAD
I feel like you are missing the point I am trying to make or refuse to see it because you want to just say I am stupid and bad at this game. So I'll Tl:Dr it for you.
Yasuo is strong as he stands. His crit and kit make him so. He sure as hell doesn't need a buff unless we are trying to make Tanks completely pointless.
Please don't get too bent out of shape over some guy speaking his opinion on the internet. I'm not important.
But he's not strong. He's weak with average at best. His kit isn't looks amazing on paper, but isn't that great when y ou play him.
Um, yasuo is really good on yasuo compositions...
So Yasuo is good in team comps designed perfectly for him? Next you're going to tell me that grass is green
Yasuo isn't a trash tier champion lol. I think he is healthy. In addition to the regular win rate u also have to look at the win rate of the mains and pick rate.
I already explained that people who are considered experienced yasuo players are averaging a 49% win rate, which shows that Yasuo isn't good right now. Catch up buddy
Try using non-shit stats sites.
Swains and karthus w are a complete joke right now , like honestly what were they thinking , revert and buff like op said. Up voted
Singed has a 18% win rate in Korea Master and Challenger with a pick rate of .1%

33%? Karthus has 43%.... you know who DOES have 33% there?
T-T

What? Riot? Admit they fucked up?
Don't mind me (pulls out telescope) just waiting for the planets to align
The very sight you linked shows Karth at 43%, and Swain at 51%. Either A) You mistyped and put the values 10% lower than they are or B) That sight is looking at too small of a timeframe, and has some wildly fluctuating data as a result.
No no, they need to nerf Skarner, Swain, Anivia and Karthus... but buff Riven and Zed.
Best balance Somalia.
That appears to be literally the worst stats site I have ever seen. And it doesn't even say what you said. Swain even has a >50% win rate. On a real stats site that gives decent data, it says that Swain and Karthus are slightly below average. Reverting the nerfs even seems excessive. Partially reverting the nerfs and not buffing seems like a better idea.
Azir %30.Where are the empty-speaking people.Azir is fine right hands bla bla bla.Same old arguments.Silly.
I just checked that site and it said swain had a 51.44% winrate and karthus 43.5%. I used to main swain so I'd like to see the nerf reverted, but either the sample sizes are so small that the winrates on that website change dramatically everyday, or you are misrepresenting statistics.
So, if this site is correct, and it probably isn't let's also buff yasuo, lee sin, vayne, leblanc, akali?
Alkali may need a slight quality of life improvement?
Alkali: Buff: Now pH is one point lower.
Maybe because they aren't popular already and when you take such a small portion of the population the results can vary randomly
Karthus is shit until 40+ minutes into the game. But then he presses R and wins so... balanced?
No.
I'll admit it, even if Karthus isn't actually at 33% winrate, he might still need a small buff back.