Should the Insta-Stun Portion Of Tibbers Be Shifted To Her W And Damage From W To Tibbers?

DrCabes·Mar 31, 2016·1 votes·547 views

Just a thought. Saw some threads about the throwing Tibbers thing again and thought I'd toss this idea into the mix. Riot likes Annie being able to instant stun and burst, but the community doesn't like them combo'd together in one spell. I'm just saying Annie'w W is an intant aoe ability so why not increase the range slightly and reduce the damage or something along those lines, and then give Tibbers a small travel time with maybe a little either a little more damage or add some kind of debuff to the W too keep her burst the same. Doing this at least gives the option to qss flash the burst damage etc and requires Annie to stun then damage etc.

Disclaimer: I really don't care if they keep Annie the same or not but obviously a lot of people seem to. This is just an idea I haven't seen mentioned and thought it was interesting to think about.

12 Comments

Dominick DestineMar 31, 20163 votes

Implying there is something wrong with Annie?

Before your changes could even be considered, you'd have to present an argument against her current status which you did not do. Do so, and we can proceed from there, before then, you're just whining.

DrCabesMar 31, 20163 votes

I already said I don't give a a rats ass about Annie. This is just a response to people complaining about how Tibbers should just be thrown.

Dominick DestineMar 31, 20162 votes

{quoted}

I already said I don't give a a rats ass about Annie.

1- That is irrelevant. 2- You just admitted that your entire thread is garbage. 3- You also just admitted that you are wasting the time of anyone that bothered to read your thread.

Present your argument and then we can proceed. Presenting conjecture and hearsay is just a complete waste of time.

DrCabesMar 31, 20162 votes

There are dozens of threads of people explaining why they think Tibbers should be thrown but none of them propose anything other than that. This is an idea in response to those threads, not a stand alone all things Annie thread. Me saying I don't care about Annie is just that. I couldn't care less if they change Annie or not but this is just an idea for people who actually care to consider since I haven't seen any of them post an actual idea.

Dominick DestineMar 31, 20162 votes

{quoted}

There are dozens of threads

Present the links. Then derive your argument based on that since you seem to be echoing it and then THAT will be your argument.

Basically, let me summarize in simple terms since you don't seem to understand any of this so far; You: "We should change Annie" Me: "Okay, why?" You: "Uhh, some dude... somewhere... said.... some... thing" Me: "That's not a very good argument, how about you make an actual argument yourself?" You: "OTHER PEOPLE SAID .... STUFF!!!!" Me: "/facepalm"

Speak only for yourself... and if you must use a representative sample to address as a response; Use an actual sample. Phantom arguments based on hearsay are utter garbage.

DrCabesMar 31, 20162 votes

Me: Post thread with titel "Should x happen" you: Freaking waste of time. No essay explaining why this should happen bla bla bla Me: Well, thats why the title is asking the questin you: No I want Links and Sources Me: Umm I really don't care what you want, this tread clearly isnt meant for you you: Fucking waste of my time Me: Uh read the title next time bud before making expecations

Dominick DestineMar 31, 20161 votes

{quoted}

Me: Post thread with titel "Should x happen" you: Freaking waste of time.

Strawman argument.

My assessment of you was wrong, you are not only wasting my time, you are not capable of NOT wasting my time. Make of that assessment of your intelligence what you will. That is all for this thread.

DrCabesMar 31, 20161 votes

You're right, if you don't have the basic reading comprehension to make an basic assumption from a title then I the only one capable of wasting your time is yourself.

Dominick DestineMar 31, 20161 votes

{quoted}

You're right, if you don't have the basic reading comprehension to make an basic assumption from a title then I the only one capable of wasting your time is yourself.

I was going to leave it at the previous post but I think I'd enjoy making your argument look foolish one last time.

The following is within the first paragraph in the second sentence you made;

thought I'd toss this idea into the mix

You were presenting statements to make changes literally within the first line of text. For you to then backpedal and try to hide behind "Oh I was not presenting changes I was just asking the question of "if she should be changed"".

Basically once again, your argument is pure garbage. gg'd , kid.

DrCabesMar 31, 20161 votes

The statements I made were explaining what I was asking from the title lol. If the title was, "Annie's Stun Power Should Be Shifted Away From Tibbers." Then your argument would make sense, but that's not the case. The title of this thread clearly suggests a mere idea and asks for input form those who would know more about said idea. You are either trolling or haven't taken any basic English classes. I don't know why I've wasting my time explaining this when you won't even understand it but congratulations on getting me to waste time.

PDE5 InhibMar 31, 20161 votes

I don't think that's a good idea. W range is too short, even with a small range increase like you said. Best option is to just have her throw the bear lol. Veigar couldn't have a stun because he could nuke you, not sure why Annie is excluded when hers is easier to pull off.

DrCabesMar 31, 20161 votes

Yeah I'm still a bit salty about what they did to my Veigar, may he rest in piece, but I don't think that alone justifies gutting Annie as well.