giving a mana cost to ekko's ult, really?

you know what, im fine with the fact that his ult will have a mana cost. what im NOT fine with is the REASON you are giving him a mana cost.

That said, from a design standpoint I do agree that there is something to the idea of "he's been spamming spells and is out of mana, now is my chance to strike." His ult not having a cost directly avoids the minor gameplay idea of "characters are weak when they're OOM."

this is bull shit because also doesnt have a mana cost on her ult and she practically does the same thing WITH MORE BURST. the only difference is she doesnt get the heal that ekko gets. so why doesnt LB have a mana cost on her ult yet? what about all of the MANALESS champions you keep throwing at the game? and dont give me that crap about "manaless champions are weak" because and has something to say about that.

you guys can give in to the ekko QQ all you want when he is actually not that strong, i dont care really. but dont give bull shit excuses like this to people when you give into the "this assassin is too bursty and kills my 2k ADC with no resistences omgawdplsnerfQQ" complaints.

"characters are weak when OOM". what a ridiculous statement indeed. mean while is just laughing it up. whats funny is you are also increasing his mana cost on his other skills, so ekko will soon be in the same boat as any other mana mage/assassin that goes up againsn a MANALESS mage/assassin. his low mana cost was actually nice to combat these manaless champs, but not anymore. say good bye to that when ekko is forced to buy an athenes just to sustain mana in lane.