I shouldn't be forced to take a loss if my team surrenders

for the TLDR and poll

poll: Should the fifth player who doesnt want to surrender be given the loss if they vote no on a surrender vote? TLDR: even in losing games, I want to keeo trying (esp in ranked) because theres always a chance for comebacks, but ill never know if certain games I couldve won where my team surrendered but I voted no, and I think that player shouldnt be given a loss for that game

non TLDR: Im tired of getting into a game with a a team we start losing then four of them decide to surrender at 20, meanwhile I want to keep going to at least try to win, but nope I see the vote pop up and four green votes and I know my vote doesnt count because all you need is 4 votes and you suddenly are slapped on the face with a loss you mightve been able have be a win.

This is frustrating enough as is after youve placed, but when you are in placements and wont to win all ten and suddenly you get a loss you had ZERO CONTROL over because the game didnt play out and you didnt have a chance to try and carry or do something different, its just stupid.

I shouldnt be forced to take a loss (esp in ranked and placements) On my stats or LP/MMR until the enemy destroyed the core and I had the entire game length to try and carry or talk to my team and convince them we can win ect ect.

everyone talks about how climbing is so easy and you have to carry yourself out of bronze/silver/gold ect

but how can I do that if my teams surrender the moment they start losing?

I could understand if it was a game to the core being destroyed, but wether it be a won or lost game one team has always surrendered in ranked games