Imagine if Zed has Ahris playrate and winrate for 2 years in a row
He would be gutted Instantly. But since Ahri is a mage and attracts tons of weebs their circlejerk will pretend that she is balanced
17 Comments
Ahri can't do the things Zed can though.
This isn't a fair comparison.
It's just another example of how it's not Win Rate/Play Rate that makes a champion frustrating to play against.
LUL no he fucking wouldn't. Looks like someone has a short term memory not remembering how much Riot shielded and glorified Zed in seasons 3 and 4. For a really long time, he was right next to Lee in contention for Riot's "favorite child" title.
Your right, if a high skill cap assassin was being played by first-timers, with relative success, that would be bad. However, Ahri isn't like Zed at all, so comparing them is like comparing Moakai and Jhin.
He pretty much did honestly. Before his bug fix nerf.
Ahri complaints?
Is this how low we shall stoop?
Goooooooood lord.
This isn't true at all. Used to be Riot would dare not nerf Zed no matter how annoying he was.
Maybe because Ahri is extremely well designed, so well so that if she wasn't successful the balancing for her would be absolutely rediculous? She's different from Zed in the sense that an overtuned Zed is gamebreaking, where as an overtuned Ahri isn't. Plus its pretty easy to balance her as a champion, which is why she is consistantly one of the most balanced champs in the game. I don't get why all of the sudden people are crying about her winrates and playrates when it's been like this for a while. Just because we start seeing her in the LCS she must be broken, right? Not that it has anything to do with the current professional midlane meta, or how she fits into professional meta teamcomps, she simply just has to be busted number-wise, right?