"Fiora is weak early game"
That is if she is laning against a melee bully like
, but if she is against a tank, she can complete invalidate the tank from the game.
That is if she is laning against a melee bully like
, but if she is against a tank, she can complete invalidate the tank from the game.
she doesn't even lose to darius its a skill matchup you need a pantheon level of early game to actually abuse her early game, even renekton doesn't do that well against her
She has a 51.4% win rate against him. Not a significant gap. I'd inclined to agree with you to some degree.
She has a 51.4% win rate against him. Not a significant gap...
The gap still exists.
And she'll Q over it.
And she'll Q over it.
'It' isn't very specific. Define 'it'. And define why her 'Q'ing over it is better than
Q over 'it'.
And? The purpose of my comment was to give the other guy some supporting evidence.
A 51.4% win rate against one champion is a soft counter at best, if even that.
And? The purpose of my comment was to give the other guy some supporting evidence.
A 51.4% win rate against one champion is a soft counter at best, if even that.
she doesn't even lose to darius its a skill matchup you need a pantheon level of early game to actually abuse her early game, even renekton doesn't do that well against her
Where in there did you not see
she doesn't even lose to darius its a skill matchup
Or are you talking about
you need a pantheon level of early game to actually abuse her early game
I thought he meant as some kind of counter, it's obviously a hyperbole (if you took his comment literally, she should have a 100% win rate).
Picking Darius against Fiora isn't an automatic lose condition, compared to say.... Mundo or Fizz.
I thought he meant as some kind of counter, it's obviously a hyperbole (if you took his comment literally, she should have a 100% win rate).
Picking Darius against Fiora isn't an automatic lose condition, compared to say.... Mundo or Fizz.
He clearly said they went 50-50?
Granted she's a counterpick to tanks. But it is kinda bullshit.
Seems she counters bruisers harder. Just beefy champions in general, really.
Not really. Poppy works well vs her early. She can deny Fioras lunges, has high base damage and high base stats. Also i had a lot of success against her as Shen. Her W cant stun Shen when he taunts, because he appears behind her
Poppy is more of a bruiser warden i'm really tanky but I still peel incredibly well while dealing pretty respectable damage kind of champion.
That is if she is laning against a melee bully like
![]()
, but if she is against a tank, she can complete invalidate the tank from the game.

Excuse me?
crying softly
crying softly
I've seen Sion as built as a bruiser. Doesn't matter what the game wants him to be. Ashe being a secondary support doesn't automatically mean Rito designed her as both.
bruiser or not she can dodge or parry anything Sion uses and then tear him to shreds. you might hit her with your W but she'll probably pop it before that QQ
ive only beaten her by maxing E lmao
bruiser or not she can dodge or parry anything Sion uses and then tear him to shreds
Well Sion is a bad champion design to begin with in this meta so...
i actually think sion's pretty well designed. it's just that in a 1v1 environment there's pretty much nothing he can do to touch fiora, which makes sense tbh
but i wish the lane wasn't so hellish
i actually think sion's pretty well designed. it's just that in a 1v1 environment there's pretty much nothing he can do to touch fiora, which makes sense tbh
but i wish the lane wasn't so hellish
He has a passive that can be cced into nothingness. What about that design is great? He would need slight tenacity increase because otherwise his passive is just useless. Not to mention you kinda don't want to die in the first place. Even Zacs passive is more useful (have to targeted 4 things), and it revives him.
I don't especially adore Sion's passive (though I love the thematic of it) but it has it's moments thanks to it's zone control (specifically when contesting objectives). I agree it's pretty situational. I try to look at Sion's W passive as his real passive, makes me feel better when I haven't even died in a game lmao
I would be happy to see a new Sion passive so I can agree with you there. It'd be cool if they could find a way to make it's idea more satisfying
I don't especially adore Sion's passive (though I love the thematic of it) but it has it's moments thanks to it's zone control (specifically when contesting objectives)
I would be happy to see a new Sion passive so I can agree with you there. It'd be cool if they could find a way to make it's idea more satisfying
I wish his Q knockup didn't take so long either. You can just walk out of it. Other than that, he seems fine. I guess.
Ahhh I'd argue that his Q is fine as it is. It's a pretty damaging stun in a pretty respectable area of effect. Once again it's great for zone control, just the threat of it can control enemy positioning really well and can make Sion really scary to maneuver around.
That being said, I think it's really really dumb whenever it's interrupted in any way. It leaves him with almost no options
Too bad it's usually lane bullies being played in the top lane then.
That is if she is laning against a melee bully like
![]()
, but if she is against a tank, she can complete invalidate the tank from the game.
That's just so untrue.
Did a Fiora just beat you in lane and now you're tilted?